[Gaffer]

I believe that I’ve read that these “fines” they mistakenly call “taxes” are not taxes, in fact. Even with Roberts’ SC edict they can be interpreted as taxes, the process of enactment creates a distinct problem with respect to legality. Hence, the confusion of ‘fines’ versus ‘taxes.

IIRC, I’ve read where the enforcement agency, the IRS, cannot execute a lien, confiscation, etc. of a “PPACA” fine on anything save a “return due to taxpayer.” It follows if one computes their liability with respect to taxes and arranges to have regular income withholding match taxes due, the IRS can’t do squat against your assets.

It will be interesting to see what happens.

[Diamond]

...It follows if one computes their liability with respect to taxes and arranges to have regular income withholding match taxes due, the IRS can’t do squat against your assets.

Yet.

Cordially,