Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: raccoonradio
Let's ask the following question: since his money laundering fee was a cool 50%, and since the reduced payout was not used to buy the things covered by food stamps, why are his clients not castigated, investigated, and prosecuted?

Manifestly, they do not need the money they've been awarded by the state for common necessaries. So why do they continue to receive it?

8 posted on 12/24/2013 12:11:01 PM PST by FredZarguna (Mother pus bucket.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: FredZarguna

Great point. And if these leeches lost their benefits for a minimum of say 5 years, this crap would be greatly reduced. But politicians don’t want that. They want to use our money to buy votes. Let’s stick them in prison too. I am sick of doing with less to pay for freeloaders.


12 posted on 12/24/2013 12:16:16 PM PST by MPJackal ("From my cold dead hands.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: FredZarguna

I hate to shock you (snark) but the Democrats want to encourage as much cheating as possible. These are Democrat voters.


27 posted on 01/07/2014 5:25:50 PM PST by cradle of freedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson