Posted on 12/24/2013 5:59:30 AM PST by thackney
Shale has the spotlight for now. But there's another, lesser-known substance with the potential to yield even greater quantities of natural gas: methane hydrate.
Hydrates consist of a lattice-like structure of frozen water molecules and methane. On the surface, they look like an ordinary block of ice. But when you hold a match to them, they burn—a visual cue signaling methane release.
"A lot of geoscientists are fascinated by hydrates because of how odd it is that you can take methane gas and add water and have it result in something with such a concentrated store of energy," said Peter Flemings, a member of the Energy Department's methane hydrate advisory committee and professor at the department of geological sciences at the University of Texas (Austin).
Hydrates form when methane and water combine under cold temperatures in a relatively high-pressure environment and are commonly found in arctic regions or in shallow sediments below relatively deep water along the outer continental shelf.
The Energy Information Administration estimates that hydrates contain more carbon than every fossil fuel available on Earth combined. EIA also reports that these ice-like structures could hold anywhere from 10,000 trillion to more than 100,000 trillion cubic feet of natural gas. By way of comparison, the administration, which acts as the independent statistical arm of the Energy Department, said in 2013 that there are just over 7,000 trillion cubic feet of technically recoverable shale gas deposits throughout the world.
All this potential isn't lost on the administration. DOE has been conducting research into methane hydrates on and off since the 1980s and recently re-upped its commitment to understanding the substance with an announcement last month that it plans to pour close to $5 million into funding for research projects exploring the potential energy source and how it could be extracted.
"We know that methane hydrates hold vast potential as a future energy resource," said Ray Boswell, the program manager on methane hydrates for the department's National Energy Technology Lab, said. "We've gotten past the question of does this substance really exist and is it available, and now we're really working to figure out how much of it is in a condition to where we can realistically consider it a part of our future energy reserve, and we're working towards that."
When asked if methane hydrates stand to play a role in the president's all-of-the-above energy strategy, Boswell replied: "Yes, absolutely."
There are risks inherent in the extraction of natural gas from hydrates, however.
Since hydrates are typically found in shallower regions than shale gas deposits, one concern is that drilling into the substance could trigger ground surface collapse.
"If you drill a hole five feet down and remove a large amount of material, there are more odds of the ground caving in than you would have if you drill 10,000 feet down," Flemings said.
Another frequently cited concern is that methane, a powerful greenhouse gas, could leak out during extraction.
Boswell insists, however, that the potential for unintended methane gas release is no higher with methane hydrates than with shale rock formations.
"That's a common misconception," he commented. "But the risks associated with hydrates are very similar to the risks that are dealt with and managed every day by the oil and gas industry in the process of drilling for natural gas in shale."
Don't expect natural gas production from hydrates to get off the ground in the U.S. anytime soon, however. As long as shale gas remains so readily available, there is no real incentive to commercialize the technology.
"At the end of the day, producing natural gas from hydrates is still much more expensive than shale gas or other conventional methods," Flemings said.
But the costs incurred to extract shale gas have dropped dramatically over the past decade, and so, too, could the price of technology needed to grab gas from methane hydrates. If that day comes, a tidal wave of fossil fuels will flood the American energy landscape.
To quote the discoverer of methane hydrate:
“I sharted!”
Ding Ding Ding, Obozo BS Machine
I thought Japan was recently supposed to be investigating the energy potential for methane hydrate deposits somewhere around their islands.
It has been under study for a long time. It has to become economic in comparison to other energy sources now in use before it becomes commercial.
Alaska as well as Japan has done some actual production of methane hydrates.
Ummm... it’s in the water. So how does drilling cause “ground surface collapse”?
What a dip-wad! (the author)
Sometimes peoples leg-bone just ain’t connected to their brain-bone!
Does Methane Hydrate only exist as a solid, or can it become a gas dissolved in a liquid....like beer?
How much energy does it take to produce it? How much usable energy is produced by this?
Is the energy density higher than that of gasoline?
It is Natural Gas, methane. It is trapped in an ice latice, frozen water. It only has to be warmed to be released, but the capture can be more difficult depending on the location.
In Arctic, (and I assume the Anarctic) a very large amount lies near the permafrost layer.
It definitely produces more energy than it requires to release, but it cost more to produce than our existing natural gas resources already in production.
It is methane. Pure form of natural gas, trapped in frozen water molecules. Once released, it is just natural gas.
Much of it is in Arctic permafrost.
There is a very good reason to mine this stuff, in that there are huge, undersea deposits of it that are unstable, and will eventually explode, as is believed to have happened before. If you can imagine millions of tons of flammable methane gas released all at once into the atmosphere, then ignited. Boom.
What makes it worse is that you don’t need a whole lot of oxygen to make it burn.
So the best way to mine it is to use mining robots operating in a carbon dioxide atmosphere, that slowly and methodically pump the methane gas through pipelines to generation stations on land.
It sounds like the best place to use it is right where it is...The Great White North.
Extracting it may not be too bad, but transporting the ice and keeping it frozen could get costly.
Seems like you could stack it up like cordwood, right outside your igloo...or polar research facility. It would probably be a lot easier than hauling in propane.
It is methane. It must be diluted with air down to 15% concentration, and at least 5% concentration, for it to burn.
Burn it in a woodstove! LOL
Burn it in a woodstove! LOL
Hey!
A specially designed “stove” with a drain/grate and plumbing, could probably provide the user with heat as well as hot and cold running water.
It works far better to warm it in place, underground, and let the gas come up a well pipe. On the surface, it is just another gas well for production equipment. That is what has already been done in trials.
There is no reason to move the frozen water. It can be left in place. Pressure drop helps release it as well.
Also, methane hydrates exist in relatively shallow sediment (compared to offshore traditional gas production) where the high pressure helps keeps the water in ice form.
I just gave away a patent idea didn’t I.
Please send your donations to:
ROCKLOBSTER Energy Research Group
555 Ice Storm Road
Downeast, Maine 04000
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.