Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alberta's Child

I disagree.

The entire scam of ad valorem taxation is unconstitutional, and conceived to confiscate property.

Services should be funded by a capitation, which is the only means provided in the constitution.


89 posted on 12/24/2013 2:16:26 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]


To: editor-surveyor

All good points there. I don’t know if an ad valorem tax is unconstitutional if it is assessed at the local or state level, but I agree that this is not a good way to raise tax revenue. I’ve long said that the ideal method of property taxation would be based on physical characteristics of the property, not the value. In the case of residential real estate, the taxes should be assessed based on the size of the lot, the number of bedrooms in the house, the size of the structure, etc. These are the things that are usually the best indicators of the property owner’s impacts on public services.


93 posted on 12/24/2013 2:21:14 PM PST by Alberta's Child ("I've never seen such a conclave of minstrels in my life.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson