Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: discostu
He is paid to be himself. Charlie Sheen is paid to be another person. A good actor is supposed to create the illusion of becoming a character unlike himself. He is no more an actor than Barbara Walters is an actor.

In any case, the real question is why A&E thought that what he said cast a shadow on their reputation. The reason is that so many businesses are running scared of the homosexual movement in this country, which seems able to go into any court in this country and win a case against anyone who refuses to do what they want.

The reductio ad absurdum is the case of the little folks like cakemakers and photography are being compelled by the courts to take clients they don’t want to take and are upfront about their reasons for not taking such customers.

You are all bent out of shape about the liberties of a big company like A&E. I am worried about the arrogance of a vicious lobby that gets after anyone who disagrees with them, and of course supports A&E because they want to send the message that no one is big enough to stand against them.

49 posted on 12/21/2013 1:40:07 PM PST by RobbyS (quotes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: RobbyS

Charlie Sheen has been playing himself on TV for a decade


50 posted on 12/21/2013 1:42:07 PM PST by GeronL (Extra Large Cheesy Over-Stuffed Hobbit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

To: RobbyS

No, he’s paid to be an entertaining VERSION of himself. There’s been plenty of discussion around the show (and others like it) about scenes being constructed. Charlie Sheen’s longest running character was a womanizing drunk.

A&E didn’t suspend him until the stink started. If they’d had a problem with what he said they’d have suspended him after the interviews (the Robertson’s say they had a person on site), or when GQ gave them the “courtesy” copy they could use to promote the interview. They didn’t suspend him at either of those windows. They suspended him when public reaction went south, when it turned out to be bad PR, had the interview not raised a stink he wouldn’t have gotten in trouble.

That’s not reducto ad absurdum, that’s people being stupid. If you don’t like the group somebody belongs to so much you don’t want to do business with them you NEVER tell the truth. Because identifiable demographic group are protected from discrimination, so if you say that’s why you don’t want their business you just committed discrimination and you’ll lose that lawsuit. You fudge around it, say you’re booked, say you don’t have the technical capabilities for what they want, quote them an insane price. They used to call it “quiet discrimination”, and it’s quite effective in protecting you from lawsuits.

I’m not bent out of shape at all, I’m pointing out basic reality. And basic reality is that YOU’RE bent out of shape, and you’re wrong. I’m just having fun watching Support Your Local Gunfighter and explaining simple concepts, nothing bent at all.


53 posted on 12/21/2013 1:54:47 PM PST by discostu (I don't meme well.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson