Posted on 12/21/2013 12:48:39 AM PST by Slings and Arrows
the rest of who? - 3 other people...making what sense???
You’re making no sense. No one has jumped down your throat. Only you have jumped to conclusions with no basis whatsoever.
“exigent circumstances”
Give me an example of a circumstance that would require a person be taken to a hospital, cavity searched, x rayed, and given laxatives and forced to crap in front of others?
Because for that to have to happen without a warrant, you need to have a reason why waiting for a warrant would either put someone at risk (did she have a bomb in her cooze?) or that evidence might be destroyed. (If she had drugs up her wazoo, they merely had to keep a watch on her while waiting for a warrant).
So tell us what possible circumstances would justify not getting a warrant?
Well - I did it...I got this article over 100 replies!!!
I bet another poster that I could do it and he/she said I couldn’t....
I want to thank everyone involved for making this effort a success.
I though around 80 mark things would slow down...but I can always rely on Freepers!
You guys have a wonderful weekend and Merry Christmas - hopefully the New Year will bring new elections in 2014 and with that will reestablish the traditions of the US of A once more!
Be safe - Christ be with you all. IF this country is not turned around in 2014 - then articles like this and govt intrusion will be the law of the land and I for one won’t be sticking around!...I don’t like smelly sticker fingers - I’m sure neither does anyone else on here!!!
So you admit to being a troll.
Jackass.
...letting the 54 yr old go to the bathroom unsupervised???
or in some cases - the plastic ruptures and the drugs start being absorbed into the body...??? That has happened and it resulted in death...
thanks for participating in the early morning discussion...the NSA thanks you!
Naw, he was beat at his own game and had to come up with that lame excuse.
no no -— I’m not troll....I was joking...
I like discussions — works the mind - early morning makes the best time do this....i enjoyed your input...as per you knowing who BCW is — well - that was interesting...I don’t think you know me as well as you say...or my background...maybe someone else you are referring to...
The frog boiled.
Or mine.
Yeah, he was trolling. Look at his about page. His replies, attitude and ideas don’t correlate with what was written on the about page. It doesn’t add up to anything else. And he is still trolling. So I will talk about him, but I won’t talk too him anymore.
You know what they say, please don’t feed the trolls.
Like I said, you’re just making up things that are not part of the story as reported here. She could have killed 8 kids in mexico and had their heads in a duffel bag, but it doesn’t say that, does it?
To be perfectly honest with you I didn’t read the story at the link, so I have nothing to say about her visiting an “uncle”, but people are allowed to have relationships, even across borders; and they are allowed to have bonds of affection, even without blood ties. [I could say a few other things here, but I won’t out of my ultimate respect for FR and our generally gentile discourse]
Wait, what am I saying? We are not “allowed” to do these things, we are FREE to do them. These are part of our inalienable rights, they come from God, not from the government, not from our peers, not from our betters, from GOD.
As to the reference to her as “Jane Doe” that is common legal usage, done when for whatever reason a person does not want their real name used (See Roe v. Wade - in this case I imagine the woman is mortified at what happened to her - you seem to think she must be a criminal but there it nothing, not an iota that substantiates that) or if their name is not known. The use of Jane Doe in this filing says NOTHING about the legitimacy of this woman or her claims.
I grew up in NYC in the 1970s, I was always very pro-cop. That has changed.
Trust me - I’ve seen the LE community drop its standards over the course of 10 yrs and what they are getting compared to what they had is 180 degree in the wrong direction...which is why I no longer participate in said functions...and yes, I fully understand the “Jane Doe” part of it...then again, like I said...a yr later could mean alot of other things and scenarios - not just the one that the ACLU is propping up in this article...I will keep an open mind on this said event and wait to see what else occurs...maybe it happened 100% exactly like the article said - or maybe it didn’t...but I’m not jumping on anyone’s side...and if there are govt abuses...do you really think Obama and his goons in DC are going to reform the CBP despite the alleged victim’s Citizenship and Freedoms?
There’s alot more that has be known about this situation other than this article or others with a few more sentences...I don’t trust the US News - I don’t trust the current govt. and I don’t trust that the direction this country is moving towards will have a happy ending!
“...please don’t feed the trolls.”
Oy veh.
Well a Merry Christmas to you all!
Merry Christmas to you too, BCW.
Just remember, as the lefties used to sing “Freedom isn’t Free”.
I remember the good ol’ days when finger rapes by border patrol agents didn’t take more than a few minutes. Stand against the wall. Drop your pants, and get the probe. Get in, and get it over with. Now a days it’s an all day affair, and they use machines instead of oily rubber gloves.
I’m laughing and crying at the same time.
There is a very tiny man playing “The Alleycat” on a stalactite organ inside one of the cavities.
When you cross the border it is controlled by border control agents not the state. The only reason she would be in line is because she had a legal right to enter.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.