[ClearCase_guy]

I see no legal grounds to stop such a thing. That's always been the problem. You cannot change the definition of marriage "just a little". If it's not one man and one woman, then it's just "anything goes".

People of intelligence saw this from the beginning.

[GeronL]

North Dakota of all places?

[Mrs. Don-o]

"If it's not one man and one woman, then it's just "anything goes".

Exactly.

And even prior to the deconstruction of marriage, there was a deconstruction of sex. If any kind of jiggery-pokery --- involving sodomy, contraception, ejaculation into the anal or oral cavity, or whatever --- redefines sex as a briefly exciting act for adult satisfaction, rather than as a procreative act related to the making of a conjugal family, there's no reason to valorize sterile heterosex over sterile homosex.