If not...then why not?
Took them long enough to admit it. I haven’t forgotten that those bastards wanted to kill hundreds of thousands.
George W. Bush: “The dang Saudis were up to their necks in the 9/11 attacks. Let’s go kill some Iraqis!”
It really should be no surprise that Saudi govt was actively involved in 9/11. If Bush knew and covered up, then he committed treason.
The Saudi’s have been funding Islamic Terrorism for decades. Its time to move away from their fossil fuels, develop our own, and get ready to nuke the Middle East
.
I’d like to know who short sold large amounts of shares of US airline stocks just hours before the terrorist strikes. We were told it happened... then just crickets.
Act of freaking war. Respond accordingly. So sad.
Oil? Will Mexico’s changing stance on oil change that?
Tommy Tancredo had the right idea...
He is what I suspect.
The house of Saud was paying off the hot heads, trying to keep them quiet. When 9-11 happened they realized some of those groups just hit their only major ally outside of Israel.
So they cut a deal. The US went to Afghanistan and Iraq, surrounding Saud’s major rival Iran, and the house of Saud sent the hot heads there for us to kill.
Except that over the last few months, someone at the State department must have blabbed. The US has cut major diplomatic ties with the Kingdom, and set up a deal with Iran. There are rumors that the US is also pushing a partition deal with Israel.
I suspect we are gearing up for a war with the house of Saud.
Ron Paul vindicated.
2 reps have it, 1D, 1R. Given sufficient guts, they could just read it on the floor of the House without any legal risk. May or may not be good for their political careers though.
Undoubtedly allowing the flight from the US of Saudi Royal family members (planeloads of them) who planned their exit before the first airliner had struck the world Trade Center.
There is no amount of oil or any other geopolitical consideration worth the lives of 3000 Americans.
Remember this?
Giuliani rejects $10 million from Saudi prince
http://edition.cnn.com/2001/US/10/11/rec.giuliani.prince/
And remember, recently, when Kerry was pushed about HOW the US was going to pay for its involvement in Syria? And he said the Saudi’s were going to pay for it? He let the cat out of the bag on that one. Basically saying the Saudis were going to hire OUR military as mercenaries.
The CIA and NSA know - the enemy knows - why in hell can't the American people know?
There's a bunch of self-important people walking around all puffed up because they're the "IN" crowd - think back to high school.. Classified this - classified that - usually to cover ineptness or stupid policy but every now and then to allow the 'in' group to swagger.
It's stupid.
We're NOT children and our intelligence people have done a crap job protecting us. It's time everyone quit pretending.
Americans died in 9/11. All of us have paid with a loss of freedom for all the creepy 'security' groups that came out of 9/11...
WE'VE earned the right to know.
I can assure you, the House of Saud knows. Bush knows, our so-called leaders know... it's time for all of us to know.
911 wasn’t just about losing 3,000 americans. Although that was an absolute tragedy, the loss of liberty has been overwhelming.......and will continue. Also consider this, Saudi Arabia sells terrorism like barrels of crude oil. Its become an open and high volume sales commodity. I’m suprised they haven’t filed for an IPO on the U.S. Stock Exchange.
The question you need to ask yourself is:
Who bought the commodity of terrorist from them to begin with? Just sayin. Think I’m a conspiracy nut? Then consider this: Where did the Alqaida Rebels come from why have they been fighting so hard to topple Libya and Syria (and Benghazi..sshhh dont say nothin). Why do we continue to send them money and weaponry? I thought Alqaida was our sworn enemy? No I’m sorry to tell you but they are nothing but government contractors for hire. They probably have a day labor parking lot site somewhere outside a middle eastern hardware store.
Its all a bit complicated.
The jihad movement in general was supported by the Saudis and tolerated by us as a hammer against the Soviets. They along with the Turks fed the chechen rebellion. Bin Ladin’s dream was a caliphate made up of the central asian republics, and was training jihadis from the ‘Stans (and everywhere else too). The Soviet Union fell apart, but in the early days after its collapse it was uncertain if it would re-constitute itself. A saudi-influenced caliphate in the former soviet ‘Stans didn’t sound like much of a threat to us. It seemed like a way to make sure the Soviet Union never rebuilt itself. Under Saudi influence, we could assume it would be friendly to the US.
But Bin Ladin’s inner circle was Egyptian Islamic Jihad, which is to say, Zawahiri and his crew. They were on Saddam’s payroll. Which is to say that Bin Ladin was recruited by a Saddamist group which then surrounded him and were his closest advisors. So the idea, repeated ad nauseum that Bin Ladin had nothing to do with Saddam was never true, and the truth hid in plain sight. Just no one wanted to see it.
So you have a movement supported and financed by the Saudis, and with Saddamists at the head of it. So while the whole “caliphate” conspiracy was no doubt Saudi, the 911 attack itself was (I believe) no doubt Saddam’s baby. He announced a false flag attack on the US to his commanders a couple of weeks before the attack, and there is no doubt in my mind that this is what he referred to. But the warm bodies who carried out the attack were Saudis, and some of their costs were picked up by the Saudi royals.
So its complicated. For whatever reason we never connected Saddam to 911 publicly, but we made sure he hanged. We also avoided connecting the Saudi royals to it, though up until 911 they were hip deep in the jihad movement. Bin Ladin’s movement served Saudi interests but weren’t above free-lancing for Saddam (I believe).
Ask GW Bush.
I recall a broadcast of "The Radio Detective" a talk show out of Fresno, CA. The host a retired LEO and owner of a private detective agency had an FBI friend as a guest. The FBI guy told how his office in Los Angeles was told to drop investigating Saudis in the area. I do not remember that the FBI agent said Saudis or simply Middle Easterners. But the Los Angeles FBI office was investigating.
The interview had to be ten years ago I am sure and the FBI agent was talking about prior to 9/11/2001. IOW the Los Angeles office was told not to investigate the ones who became part of the 9/11/01 attacks. If my memory is correct the order originated in the Clinton Administration.
AS I recall LA was not the only FBI office told to back off.. the most famous one was Minneapolis IIRC.
Save
bookmark