Replies

So here is what we have here. This liberal activist judge could care less what the Supreme Court ruled in 1896, when it said Polygamy was illegal. So if this fruitcake can overrule the Supreme Court, it is only a matter of time before it goes back to the Supreme Court where Anthony Kennedy and John Roberts will side with the liberals and Polygamy will once again be not only legal in Utah, but it will also be the law of the land. Then it will be OK for some pervert that likes to sex with a dog to marry his dog. This is how backwards this country has became with the liberals that now control the US Supreme Court. If marriage is not legally defined as one man and one woman and nothing else, it means nothing anymore. Nothing at all. Sodomites have won, because the US Supreme Court is loaded with them. I am saying all this because if the case returns to the Supreme Court they will legalize Polygamy and every other type of degenerate activity you can think of.

The slope has been iced - rationale based on prior bad decisions 9hjomosexual marriage/abortion, etc.) will be come the norm. Though I disagree with the guy's decision, I understand his rationale: If keeping one traditionally nonstandard from marrying and it is unconstitutional, then stopping any non-traditional set of prospective folks/beasts/objects is also unconstitutional.

The real point is that none of this bit about marriage has anything to do with the Constitution - the Constitution was subverted to allow that which should not be forced upon a Free People and to remove absolute rights that the very Constitution says are not to be infringed upon.

Though I disagree with the guy's decision, I understand his rationale: If keeping one traditionally nonstandard from marrying and it is unconstitutional, then stopping any non-traditional set of prospective folks/beasts/objects is also unconstitutional.

Yeah...

I, too, understand the rationale: If killing the unwanted and unneeded human in a CHOOSEY mother's womb is constitutional, then getting rid of unwanted and unneeded Gramma is ALSO constitutional.