This is why you can’t try to “thread the needle” with
social liberalism
and
fiscal conservatism.
Social liberalism is all about there being no consequences,
but there always are consequences. If the person BEING “socially liberal” has to pay for the consequences,
then their freedom is being impinged. Someone else HAS to pay for the consequences according to social liberalism.
Yep, reality does not favor liberalism. Period.
“This is why you can’t try to “thread the needle” with
social liberalism
and
fiscal conservatism.”
Hmmmmm, interesting point.
I wonder how many people fall into that category? Or is the Republican Party being encouraged to “reach out” to a small or non-existent contingent? Hmmmmm . . .
For if someone were a fiscal conservative, they apparently are open to reason and logic, and the laws of economics, the practicality of balancing a budget, and some of human behavior such as the incentives to save and produce, the ill-effects of excess taxation, etc.
Such a person could believe in social-irresponsibility only by compartmentalizing logic and reason to part of his or her brain. Which is again delusional . . .
OR maybe they would able to be convinced by facts, logic, and reason on other issues . . .
. . . interesting