Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fonda Foundation Not So Charitable, Records Show
The Smoking Gun. ^ | 12- 12- 2013

Posted on 12/12/2013 12:23:07 PM PST by george76

With 800k in bank, star's group hasn't donated dime since 2006.

...

According to the Jane Fonda Foundation’s most recent tax return--filed last year and covering calendar year 2011--the organization’s cash, stock, and bond portfolio was valued at $798,133. The filing lists the 75-year-old actress as the foundation’s president and chairman of the board, and reports that she devotes 10 hours a week to the charitable group.

...

IRS regulations require private foundations to make annual distributions totaling at least five percent of its assets

(Excerpt) Read more at thesmokinggun.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption
KEYWORDS: fonda; hanoijae; hanoijane; irs; janefonda; taxes

1 posted on 12/12/2013 12:23:07 PM PST by george76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: george76
Many celebrity "foundations" are more about promoting liberal candidates than doing good work for those in need.

...too many

2 posted on 12/12/2013 12:25:42 PM PST by Baynative (Wake me up early, be good to my dogs and teach my children to pray.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76
No surprises here. Move on. /sarc
3 posted on 12/12/2013 12:27:35 PM PST by immadashell (The inmates are running the asylum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

It seems to me that if Fonda’s foundation has violated the IRS 5% spending rule, it will lose its tax-exempt status and the nearly $800K will be taxed at the same level as her earned income.


4 posted on 12/12/2013 12:31:36 PM PST by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

5 posted on 12/12/2013 12:32:00 PM PST by Paine in the Neck (Socialism consumes everything)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Baynative
Many celebrity "foundations" are more about promoting liberal candidates the celebrity than doing good work for those in need.

That's better --

6 posted on 12/12/2013 12:35:32 PM PST by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: EDINVA

Yes, you’d think so.

There are a lot of worthy, totally non-political causes/organizations out there. You could find several of them every year to give money to.

Or just wait for some natural disaster to hit and send money there.

Easy-peasy if you’re actually trying to help people and not just avoid paying YOUR FAIR SHARE!


7 posted on 12/12/2013 12:45:40 PM PST by jocon307
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jocon307

I think every last one of those worthy, totally non-political causes has hit me up for a donation in the past two weeks alone! And some political ones, too.


8 posted on 12/12/2013 12:51:25 PM PST by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip
re: Many celebrity “foundations” are more about promoting the celebrity than doing good work for those in need.

So true. There are even organizations that pair up celebrities with charitable causes. It is considered a “win-win” because the charitable organization gets to use the celebrity's name in their fund-raising, while the celebrity benefits from increased exposure and good PR, often without even having to donate a single dime of their own money.

9 posted on 12/12/2013 1:05:40 PM PST by Nevadan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: EDINVA

Did they send you return address labels? Those are good and I try and send some money, provided I support the cause at all. Otherwise I throw the labels away.

And I just gave 2 big bags of clothes to Lupus.

The most important aspect of that is them helping me get rid of clutter, since I accept that I will never sell anything on ebay.

Losing a bunch of stuff due to Sandy has made parting with the rest(like some very nice clothes that, sadly, so sadly, will never fit me again).

Sigh, one skirt I actually kissed goodbye. That sounds very silly I know, but it was a 100% English Wool Challis skirt, you could wear it, throw in it a ball in the corner, leave it there for 3 weeks, shake it out and wear it again and look like a million bucks.

I’m rambling - goodbye beautiful skirt, maybe Lady Jane Fonda will buy me another one. (Size 14 Jane, if you should by happenstance see this!)


10 posted on 12/12/2013 1:30:03 PM PST by jocon307
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: jocon307

I “get” the skirt. Sounds like the equivalent of the Irish Waling Hat. Indestructible and always looks good.


11 posted on 12/12/2013 1:40:22 PM PST by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: EDINVA

Say what you like about the French, the Brits/Celts do textiles like nobody else!


12 posted on 12/12/2013 2:34:32 PM PST by jocon307
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: george76

BTTT


13 posted on 12/13/2013 8:32:44 AM PST by Berlin_Freeper (I'm a guanka in a bunkaquank in Eskimo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson