Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hitler's Plan to Attack America (Why Hitler Jumped at War With U.S.)
History News Network ^ | December 11, 2013 | Professor Gerhard L. Weinberg

Posted on 12/11/2013 5:51:00 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-140 next last
To: Axenolith

That point reminds me of a story from the early days of WWII when Britain was evacuating children to Canada. A London woman whose children were being sent over wired relatives in Vancouver asking them to meet her kids when their ship landed in Halifax. The Vancouver relatives wired back, “You meet them- you’re closer than we are.”


81 posted on 12/11/2013 9:24:25 PM PST by Squawk 8888 (I'd give up chocolate but I'm no quitter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS

At time of surrender in 1945 the Japanese had 1 million troops in Manchuria. Enough to “invade” Russia from the southeast and try to link up with German forces from the West? Probably not considering the need to occupy China. Enough that it should have caused the Russians to look both directions during the war? Yeah, I think so.

I don’t think Japan had the notion or stomach for a land war with Russian and I think they kinda transmitted than to them regardless of what they might have been telling Germany at the time.


82 posted on 12/11/2013 9:29:15 PM PST by FAA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: FredZarguna
Hitler didn't even have the sealift capacity to invade Britain across 27 miles of water. How the hell was he going to invade the United States?

He might have, but he didn't have air dominance. The Battle of Britain, where the elimination of the RAF had been the initial focus, suffered from mission creep and degenerated into a campaign against population centers which only stiffened British resolve.

Failure to eliminate the RAF caused a loss of air dominance, precluding the invasion attempt. Bombing civilian targets justified the collateral damage of the later Allied bombing campaigns.

83 posted on 12/11/2013 9:42:05 PM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe
He did not; he never did. His admirals repeatedly told him they were in no position to defeat the British Navy.

Goering's ill-fated campaign was an appeal to his vanity, but it may have been nothing more than an attempt to force the British to sue for peace so they could be dealt with at leisure. It very is doubtful he planned any amphibious assault until after the Soviets were defeated.

84 posted on 12/11/2013 9:56:30 PM PST by FredZarguna (Have wun gill ravel treads the mard of rocan. kan ight ithout warmor in a lavage sand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe

“He might have, but he didn’t have air dominance. The Battle of Britain, where the elimination of the RAF had been the initial focus, suffered from mission creep and degenerated into a campaign against population centers which only stiffened British resolve.

Failure to eliminate the RAF caused a loss of air dominance, precluding the invasion attempt. Bombing civilian targets justified the collateral damage of the later Allied bombing campaigns. “

Control of the air above the Channel was the key to Sea Lion and as you say the Luftwaffe’s devolution from attacking airfields toward attacking population centers was its undoing.

Though, to the OP’s thoughts about a German invasion of Britain, I have always wondered about that. The channel boats and river ferries they massed to try to plan that crossing seem so puny in light of what the Allies put in play 4 years later to accomplish the Normandy landings. The Germans, once the RAF dealt with, seemed it a mere cross channel fairy ride to land on England’s shores in comparison. With that I must think they believed the Stukas would take care of the Royal Navy’s interference in the affair and that invading the south of England would be assumed at that point. They invaded Norway after all and that was, geographically, a more daunting task than little old England in their minds.


85 posted on 12/11/2013 10:01:58 PM PST by FAA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: RitchieAprile

[For the Japanese,] moving on siberia would have made no sense.

IINM, it was the crushing defeat of the Japanese Army in the Battle of Khalkhin Gol by Soviet forces under General (later Marshall) Georgii Zhukov that convinced the Japanese to stay neutral viz. Germany and the USSR in WWII.


86 posted on 12/11/2013 10:14:57 PM PST by eddiespaghetti ((with the meatball eyes))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

Ju 390...


87 posted on 12/11/2013 10:28:15 PM PST by Axenolith (Government blows, and that which governs least, blows least...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: eddiespaghetti

Bump to post 86

After the brutal drubbing Zhukov laid on the Japanese Army you know they didn’ t really want Siberia after all. :)

The Russians understood concepts like “ tanks” and “artillery” that apparently didn’t translate into Japanese very well.


88 posted on 12/11/2013 11:03:03 PM PST by Rockpile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: stormhill

They would have killed him eventually. One more unwinnable war would have done it.


89 posted on 12/12/2013 2:30:44 AM PST by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
It's plausible but there were too many variables to be certain.
The Gestapo and two-million strong Waffen-SS had the resources and fanatical devotion to detect and stop any conspiracy however large. On the other hand, the Stauffenberg plot in '44 would have probably worked if someone had been willing to sacrifice himself in the assassination attempt. Of course, they already had all the motivation they needed without yet another "unwinnable war."

A more likely scenario is that in the face of failure he would have offed himself...oh, wait; HE DID!

90 posted on 12/12/2013 4:36:12 AM PST by stormhill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: FAA

Well, the problem for the British was they had to abandon most of their heavy equipment—tanks, APCs, artillery, trucks—that the BEF left on the beaches of Dunkirk. The late summer of 1940 was tough for them. They had men, but were low on everything, including ammo.

Perhaps an invasion by ferry would not be so far-fetched, if the British had no means to offer a defense-in-depth at the water’s edge...


91 posted on 12/12/2013 5:49:28 AM PST by Alas Babylon! (Joe Wilson was dead on! Expunge his censor or censor Pelosi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!

Take a close look at films and photos of British troops hauling ass at Dunkirk and see if you can spot any of them even carrying a rifle. Not very many. They at least could have toted some man- portable stuff back to England.


92 posted on 12/12/2013 6:35:05 AM PST by Rockpile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Rockpile

The British made much of their “Miracle at Dunkirk” but it really was an unmitigated disaster.

That they were able to return so many men to England also had a lot to do with the Germans hoping to get Britain to sue for peace. They could’ve conducted much more aggressive operations against the fleet of vessels involved in the rescue.

It was great that so much of the BEF didn’t finish the war in POW camps or died defending themselves, but all that was a silver lining in a very dark cloud.

Imagine if Chamberlain, rather than Churchill, was still Prime Minister... He might have waved another piece of paper in the air that had the Articles of Surrender on it... Imagine a British National Socialist party in charge of the Royal Navy...

What could have the United States done in the Fall of 1940? Nothing! Still, eventually our commerce would’ve made shipping goods to Nazi Europe as routine as shipping goods to the UK and France. We might have even been a willing partner to Hitler’s war on the Soviet Union...

We owe a lot to a British half-American named Winston.


93 posted on 12/12/2013 6:54:41 AM PST by Alas Babylon! (Joe Wilson was dead on! Expunge his censor or censor Pelosi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer
Not unlike Montana attacking the US. Germany is about the size of Montana.

In December 1941, "Grossdeutschland" stretched from the Pyrenees to Moscow from west to east and from the Arctic Circle to Egypt from north to south. That's a bit bigger than Montana.

94 posted on 12/12/2013 6:58:27 AM PST by Colonel_Flagg (Some people meet their heroes. I raised mine. Go Army.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Colonel_Flagg

The. Original. German. Borders.


95 posted on 12/12/2013 7:21:59 AM PST by SkyDancer (Live your life in such a way that the Westboro church will want to picket your funeral.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer

I. Get. That.

But at the time Hitler declared war on the United States, he controlled continental Europe. That’s quite a different scenario than what you describe. It wasn’t Montana declaring war on the United States. It was Hitler and the exploited resources of Europe declaring war on the United States.


96 posted on 12/12/2013 7:40:15 AM PST by Colonel_Flagg (Some people meet their heroes. I raised mine. Go Army.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer; Colonel_Flagg

What. Is. With. The. Single. Word. Sentences. It. Is. So. Weird.

Actually. No. Now. I. Am. Starting. To. Like. It. I. Think. I. Will. Keep. Doing. It.

This. Is. Fun. Wow. I. Love. It. Do. Not. Let. Me. Stop.


97 posted on 12/12/2013 7:42:34 AM PST by Lazamataz (Early 2009 to 7/21/2013 - RIP my little girl Cathy. You were the best cat ever. You will be missed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

You. Are. A. Wild. Man.

:)

Just giving what I get, man.


98 posted on 12/12/2013 7:43:54 AM PST by Colonel_Flagg (Some people meet their heroes. I raised mine. Go Army.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Colonel_Flagg

No! If! I! Was! Truly! Wild! They! Would! Be! Exclamation! Points!


99 posted on 12/12/2013 7:47:20 AM PST by Lazamataz (Early 2009 to 7/21/2013 - RIP my little girl Cathy. You were the best cat ever. You will be missed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

You made my morning, Laz. With only a few punctuation marks!


100 posted on 12/12/2013 7:49:05 AM PST by Colonel_Flagg (Some people meet their heroes. I raised mine. Go Army.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-140 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson