You say this after fully reading the article I supplied???
You didn’t read it??
I leave it to others to judge betwixt us.
(I would have read the article before replying)
You brought a smile to my face!!!
I will just leave you with that! :)
I read the article. The “evidence is thin, incomplete or hearsay.
So here’s a thought experiment for you - if the stones are real, why do you assume that this proves that dinosaurs existed recently? Would you allow that (if they were real) the stones could also indicate that humans have been around for a lot longer than generally assumed (millions of years)?