Simply put: Biologically, girls and women are compelled to put on “displays” to attract potential mates. Extremely common in the animal kingdom. Liberals even defend the “right” of women to dress for display.
Again, biologically, boys and men are just as compelled to *notice* such “displays”, and then compete with each other for the attentions of the females. And again, this happens all the time in the animal kingdom. However, liberals deride boys and men doing this; which sort of defeats the purpose of the exercise.
If you think about it, if liberals are successful in preventing men from noticing women, it is the women who suffer most. This is because competition among women to find suitable mates is fierce already, and over a very limited time frame, and frustration produces some bizarre psychologies in women:
1) “Desperation to display”. In younger women this is usually seen in “overdoing it”, dressing so gaudily that they just look silly. Many others are caught in just the other direction, using increasing amounts of nudity to get male attention. In effect it is screaming: “Stare at my body!” Never look up “selfies” on the Internet, or you will find millions of nude pictures of girls and women that they took themselves, and posted with a desperate plea to “pay attention to me”. It’s just sad.
2) Even worse is “attention addiction”, in which women will stay with any male who gives them attention, good or bad. This is often a technique used by pimps to control prostitutes. It doesn’t matter if he is beating her or dancing with her, as long as he pays attention to her, she will not leave him. N.B.: a superb indicator of an attention addict, with very low self esteem, are a copious number of finger rings and bracelets.
Being denied the ability to observe female displays also fouls up men. Saudi Arabia is well known as a huge importer of Internet pornography. All those men, desperate to look at women, because they are biologically programmed to, no matter what Mohammed thinks.
Stop puttin' those ideas in my head!