To: Windflier
I'm curious to know how we know that, considering the fact that we don't have a receiver hundreds of light years away from here to check it. Perhaps I phrased that poorly. How about this: "Narrowband radio broadcast should be detectable with current technology at a distance of hundreds of light years or more, given our understanding of how radio works."
100 posted on
12/08/2013 11:04:51 PM PST by
Kip Russell
(Be wary of strong drink. It can make you shoot at tax collectors -- and miss. ---Robert A. Heinlein)
To: Kip Russell; null and void
How about this: "Narrowband radio broadcast should be detectable with current technology at a distance of hundreds of light years or more, given our understanding of how radio works." Works for me.
(I'm too tired to argue too :-)
109 posted on
12/08/2013 11:28:53 PM PST by
Windflier
(To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson