Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jimmyray

“Hospitals would do that at their own peril, as their relationship is symbiotic”

I don’t think so. Bamys plan is to have a single payer system in which all docs will ultimately work for the government. One of the easiest ways to do this will be to prohibit docs from having privileges at hospitals unless they are willing to accept government payments.


26 posted on 12/08/2013 3:07:59 AM PST by freeangel ( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: freeangel
In the Canadian system, specifically in Alberta, where I have consulted with AHS, the Doctors band together and contract with the hospitals (AHS). The doctors have access to the facilities, and the Hospitals have access to the doctors.

In the US, with the rise of satellite and specialty outpatient services, many (most?) Doctors can often forgo the need to associate with hospitals at all. Several Doctors friends of ours don't practice in hospitals (primary care, allergists, pediatricians), and others are there infrequently (OB-GYN on call).

However, I can't underestimate the power of a coercive government.

27 posted on 12/08/2013 3:23:42 AM PST by jimmyray
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson