Posted on 12/05/2013 11:12:57 AM PST by SeekAndFind
Health-care reporters have been zeroed in lately on the 834 error rate, i.e. the rate of garbled or phantom enrollment data transmitted from Healthcare.gov to insurance companies as people sign up. WaPo claimed the other day that the rate is as high as one-third, but HHS, knowing a looming PR catastrophe when it sees one, has refused to give reporters a hard number. The media’s focus on that is all to the good — the higher the 834 error rate, the more chaos there’ll be next month in sorting out the big surge of applications in December — but there’s another key rate that’s being overlooked. Namely, what’s the rate of people who somehow, miraculously, have completed the sign-up process on Healthcare.gov but then failed to send a payment to their new insurer for their first month of premiums? I haven’t seen a single estimate of that yet even though it’s a crucial metric: If you don’t pay by New Year’s Eve, you’re not enrolled, even if you successfully signed up on the website. If there’s a huge nonpayment rate among new sign-ups, there’ll be a huge number of people who show up to see the doctor next month only to find, to their great confusion and annoyance, that they have no coverage because they haven’t paid yet.
That brings me to this new piece from CNN Money, from which I learned two important things. One: If you sign up but fail to pay by December 31st, it’s not a simple matter of your coverage being suspended until you pony up. Your enrollment is void and you have to re-enroll on the website in January. Imagine how well Healthcare.gov is likely to cope if, next month, there are suddenly hundreds of thousands of people flooding into the site trying to sign up again because they forgot to pay on time before. And two: At least one insurer out there is keeping tabs on its nonpayment rate and sharing that number with the media. And the results are … not good:
While the Obama administration has reported that more than 100,000 Americans picked plans in October, the first month of open enrollment, it’s not known how many of them have paid.
One insurer, Physicians Health Plan of Northern Indiana, has received payments from only about 20% of applicants, nearly all using the firm’s online portal, said Jim Brunnemer, the chief financial officer. It is sending invoices and email reminders to those who haven’t yet sealed the deal. If payment isn’t made by New Year’s Eve, PHP has been told by federal officials that it must void the application.
Another complication is that insurers also don’t have a lot of time to process applications and send out ID cards. The timeline, particularly over the holiday week, will prove “challenging” for some companies, one industry executive said.
Yesterday I guesstimated, based on the most recent enrollment numbers, that something like 1.5 million people will sign up by December 23rd. Not every insurer will have a payment rate as poor as the one in Indiana cited above, but even if you triple it and assume 60 percent are paying on time, that’s still 600,000 people — roughly the population of Washington D.C. — that went to the trouble of signing up and then, for various and unknown reasons, didn’t complete enrollment by tendering payment. Maybe that’s because they’re short on cash right now, maybe they meant to pay and simply forgot, or maybe they didn’t read the fine print and thought they wouldn’t be expected to pay until January. My guess is that most of them fall into the last group. Which means all hell’s going to break loose next month.
…unless the White House comes up with another “workaround.” They’ve already proved that they’re willing to overpay insurers temporarily in the interest of kickstarting enrollment; why wouldn’t they also offer to cover the first month of premiums for new enrollees who forgot to pay so that the missing revenue is available to insurers? Enrollees could pay the feds back later, maybe by having the value of those premiums withheld from their tax refunds in April if need be. (That’s how the mandate penalty will be collected, after all.) Given how lawless O has been in suspending the employer mandate and un-canceling plans, and given his willingness to perform frantic triage on the law politically by extending deadlines regardless of the policy consequences, it’s hard to believe he’d allow the nonpayment problem to wreak havoc next month. That’s the last thing Democrats need once they’ve finally made it past December 23rd and caught their breath over the holidays. Obama’s going to do something to “solve” this problem too. With your money, of course.
Back to the 834 problem, though. To prepare for today’s daily media conference call with HHS, watch Bob Laszewski’s interview with Megyn Kelly from last night. The key bit is the end of the clip when Laszewski insists, contra the White House’s claims that they improved the back end of Healthcare.gov as part of the big site upgrade before the November 30th repair deadline, that the 834 error rate was just as high on Monday of this week as it’s been in the past. If he’s right and that doesn’t change soon, insurers will have an unholy mess on their hands next month in sorting out hundreds of thousands of indecipherable enrollments. But look on the bright side: Even a low rate of accurate data is better than zero — which is what it is right now for Medicaid enrollments transmitted from Healthcare.gov to the states. Stay tuned.
Related:
Obamacare: You’re not insured until you pay
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3098561/posts
If they did it through the federal site, none, because that problem-plagued site is only a partially functional site with no payment collection mechanism. It is a bogus shell site just to provide the administration some numbers they can boast about. Even with that, they couldn’t get that right. What incompetence!
Obama will pay for them with your money
and the answer is....
“paid ??? Have I paid ???
but this is ObamaCare. Its free...”
Fast answer - darned near nobody has actually been put on the rolls as “insured”, except those who got in on Medicaid.
The answer is none. The back end code to pay the insurers has not been written. Therefore no payments have been made for the policies. I think there will be a lot of people in 2014, assuming they are covered; but will not be covered.
So these people not covered will be penalized for not being covered? Good thing all their info was entered into the system, it will be easier to extract the penalty from their account until they are covered. At least they won’t have to enroll again. Right?
Where does he get that money? Under what appropriation? Maybe the House shouldn't (or didn't) appropriate for that.
Good luck recovering ‘payment’ from the indigent. Those of us who pay our taxes will pick up the tab. Come to think of it, that’s another great reason to Go Galt.
As for the reason why people didn’t pay when they signed up, it could be that after giving all their vital information short of their blood type, they might have assumed the insurance company would just debit the amount owed from their bank account. From what I’ve heard, when signing up you have to give your bank account info.
RE: but this is ObamaCare. Its free...”
Of course if you’re a beneficiary, it’s free.... but SOMEONE has to pay... Guess who?
“Other peoples’ money” The Obamanauts are still waiting for those of us who pay taxes to sign on.
In any event, Barry will charge the expenses to the US Treasury and they’ll present us with the bill.
If they’re waiting on me they’d better be patient. I’m not even paying any “penalty”.
Maybe some of the state run sites accept payments, not sure though.
LOL let’s set up a fake website to take Obamacare payments.
I bet we’d collect a few bucks....
Does the Obamacare website accept foodstamps as payment ?
They made it so people would have to come up with a huge insrance premium right before Christmas. So, they can either buy insurance when no one is sick. Or they can buy Christmas presents. I have a feeling a lot of people spent all their money on Black Friday.
What happens when people who paid are not reimbursed for their premiums, when the ‘law’ is gutted?
They will not have insurance OR their money!!
They are busy..
People realize they have to "buy" something so rather than go to the unsafe "exchanges" they are buying a policy in the private sector.....
Gee, what a concept...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.