It’s going to be nothing but fun waiting for the smokers to figger out that smoking can’t be a “pre-existing “condition? Aids is OK but smoking? You smokers please report immediately to your closest deathpanel. After they tie you to a post or gurney you’ll get one last cigarette. I’m still waiting for my check in the mail çause the Kenyan said I was gonna save $2,500 per year——waiting-—waiting-—not holding breath tho.
Lung cancer kills people before their time. It usually can't be cured, so it's cheaper than treating people for Diabetes, which they'll get if they eat instead of smoke and blimp out and is expensive for treatment. So wouldn't it be a better idea to provide cigarettes for free?
Meanwhile, think about all of those STDs that will happen with no-consequence sex with mulitple partners. Women with STDs are more likely to have children with lifelong problems. They'll be expensive to keep healthy. Those free methods of birth control are going to get mighty expensive for society.
So what's the only logical conclusion? Free cigarettes for all and free condoms but not free birth control!
(for those of you who don't understand my humor, it's satire. I like to take absurd premises and follow them to the logical conclusion they would cause.)
Not covered by subsidy and can be up to 50% increase. And since the poor smoke more ...