WHAT??!!??
Posted on 12/03/2013 1:21:09 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
Sorry for the corny title of this article — I was going to call it “It’s the Centrifuges, Stupid!” — but as a Hollywood movie executive famously said in a script meeting, “Obviousness is your friend.” He was right about screenplays and he’s right here. No one believes Barack Obama about anything anymore. Why should they? The new Iran deal is Obamacare II, only worse, a thousand megatons worse.
So many things are wrong with the agreement coming out of Geneva, it’s hard to know where to begin (for an excellent overall go to The Israel Project’s Tower website or look right here with our resident expert Dr. Ledeen), but the most egregious part indeed comes down to centrifuges. Iran has some 19,000 of them — more than three times the amount of longtime nuclear-armed Pakistan. The agreement forbids the Iranians to build anymore, but, much more importantly, it allows the Iranians to fix any of their centrifuges that may be broken and get them working again..
How many of those 19,000 are broken? I’m not sure anyone outside Iran knows, but as will be recalled, the Stuxnet computer virus of 2010 was designed to bring these centrifuges to a halt and apparently did so quite successfully in many cases. But now — thanks to the deal that Obama and Kerry have put together — the Iranians will have six unmolested months to get as many of them up and running as they can, enriching uranium.
Speaking of which, Iran’s “right to enrich” is supposedly still under dispute, the Americans saying one thing about the language in the deal and the Iranians another. Some dispute. The prologue to the “interim” agreement states that the amount of enrichment will be decided in future negotiation, not (nota bene) whether enrichment will be allowed or not. (The specific language reads: “a mutually defined enrichment program with practical limits and transparency measures to ensure the peaceful nature of the program.” Uh-huh.) Meanwhile, Iran is able to enrich up to five percent, not the previous alleged maximum of 3.5%. Whatever happened to that other 1/5%? Confusing, no? Oh, well, that’s a long way from the 20% needed for weaponization.
No, it’s not. It’s not very much at all when you have 19,000 centrifuges. How much of a setback for the Iranian nuclear weapons program is this five percent permissible level then? According to the New York Times, about as pro-Obama a publication as you can get outside of a Chicago Democratic Party newsletter, the current agreement will retard the Iranian program only about one month.
One month? For this we give them oodles of desperately needed cash — seven billion on the face of it but some suggest that’s floating up to twenty — not to mention ending sanctions on such things as auto parts. This is great for Ayatollah Khamenei who, we have learned recently, owns the BMW distributorship in Iran.
Nevertheless, we are told by such wise men as Brent Scowcroft and Zbigniew Kazimierz Brzezinski that this is a good deal and we should jump at it. More specifically, these realists attest, this is the best deal we can get now.
Really? The Iranians came to the table because of sanctions. We are now lifting them and, simultaneously, encouraging others to think proactively about doing business with Iran, a potential gold (or oil) mine. We are also ratifying the hellacious Islamic regime of the mullahs that oppresses women, murders homosexuals and imprisons and tortures all those who oppose it. Forget human rights. What are they? America (really Obama in this instance) just wants a deal.
It’s not surprising. Obama never did anything for the Green Movement. Why should he care now, especially with his post-Obamacare numbers imploding? Anything to move the ball and distract the news cycle. So what if Ayatollah Khamenei called Israel a “rabid dog” about three days ago while the throng before him yelled “Death to America” and “Death to Israel”? It’s just a little hyperbole, right? He’s not serious. This isn’t Munich. This is a respectful negotiation between peers.
“No, it’s not,” I repeat, again obviously. This is the desperate move of a president in free fall, only it’s a move being made with millions of lives at stake. If the sanctions in place brought Iran to the table, why wouldn’t ratcheting up the sanctions, as Congress sought to do, get Iran actually to agree to dismantle its program, to shrink back the extraordinary number of centrifuges we know them to have, a number vastly higher than any peaceful nation could possibly need?
Now we will never know.
So we have left it all to Israel and, incredible as it may seem, Saudi Arabia to put a stop to this madness. What will they do? I wouldn’t want to be them. It’s no fun at all Perhaps a new prayer should be added to the Jewish liturgy. “Thank G-d I wasn’t born Benjamin Netanyahu.”
You know there is a good probability that several enemies of the US are weighing the odds of US retaliation in the light of any spectacular attack on us.
If there were a situation where a nuclear device was detonated by a lesser country, or say the Chinese launched a limited strike, and the President hesitated or declined to retaliate the nation would be at the precipice. I could see that situation degenerating into the Constitutionally inclined military trying to wrest him from office with him being backed by a social parasite militia...
Normally I would agree with you on this but Pat Buchanan said pretty much the same thing recently in an article on the subject.
:)
They've been working on heavy water for a while now. No doubt in my mind they're thinking fusion weapons.
Which raises the ante a bunch. Instead of 15-20 kilotons going off downtown (which is what one expects with a terrorist nuclear attack), now you're talking about military-grade strategic weapons with yields in the hundreds of kilotons, up to the megaton range. Now you are talking about extreme termination of a whole Standard Metropolitan Statistical Area.
Bump
One recent report said that the deal included commercial airline flight permissions.
Before, I figured that they would place their first nuke on board a private Bertram yacht and cruise it up the Potomac to the Tidal Basin.
Now all they have to do is to include it in the Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigade First Class cabin excess baggage on the next Iran Air flight into Dulles, then declare an emergency divert to Washington National.
“Eye Cee Bee Emmms? We don’t need no steenking missiles. We have Airbus!”
Naah. Dear leader could nuke a few cities on his own and congress wouldn’t impeach. He has complete carte blanche to do whatever he wants. And he knows it.
What are a few million lives compared to the glorious socialist revolution? What are a few million lives to a living god like Barack 0bama?
Bump!
Thanks 2ndDivisionVet.
White House Exploring Ways to Let Iran Enrich Uranium
http://freebeacon.com/white-house-exploring-ways-to-let-iran-enrich-uranium/
Posted on 12/3/2013 5:36:53 PM by kcvl
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3097863/posts
Why so extreme?
If Benghazi isn't enough...
Indeed!
We have killed 55,000,000 by CHOICE; and we're worried about MUSLIMS???
Well...when that suitcase nuke goes if in the center of the Mall in DC...
No need to impeach or remove anybody....
Problem solved..../ S
If you’d like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
..................
If they pick the right Standard Metropolitan Statistical Area, they'd actually be doing us a favor.
Your goat can do a whole lot better than Obama. Don’t let her settle.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.