Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: vladimir998

“They’re Commonwealths. I was right.”

Yet you said: “They’re not states” and you were wrong.

It’s a misunderstanding on your part. “Commonwealth” states do not imply socialism, in the context of the statements that are the subject of the thread.

I corrected you, you lashed out inappropriately. You should cheer up, or your mother may send you to bed without any pumpkin pie.


301 posted on 11/28/2013 11:19:38 AM PST by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 300 | View Replies ]


To: RFEngineer

“Yet you said: “They’re not states” and you were wrong.”

Nope. They’re commonwealths. That’s why they are officially called commonwealths.

“It’s a misunderstanding on your part.”

Nope. There is no misunderstanding on my part.

““Commonwealth” states do not imply socialism, in the context of the statements that are the subject of the thread.”

I never said - or even remotely implied - that ‘commonwealth’ implied socialism. Again, you have a very active imagination. Care to make up anything else out of thin air?

I corrected you, you lashed out inappropriately. You should cheer up, or your mother may send you to bed without any pumpkin pie.


303 posted on 11/28/2013 11:36:35 AM PST by vladimir998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 301 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson