Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

the Secretary’s decision may have been intended to reward pharmaceutical companies for their support of health care reform.

Gee, ya think?

1 posted on 11/22/2013 1:49:25 PM PST by Behind Liberal Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Behind Liberal Lines

She is not a court officer and not legally competent to make that decision.


2 posted on 11/22/2013 1:52:04 PM PST by Mouton (The insurrection laws perpetuate what we have for a government now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

The law is what we say it is whenever we say it, and not one second before or after..............


6 posted on 11/22/2013 2:00:07 PM PST by Red Badger (Proud member of the Zeta Omicron Tau Fraternity since 2004...................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

I suspect part of this is Obama’s inviting the insurers to the White House and then telling them to break the law regarding Obamacare’s requirements on policies.

I’ve kind of wondered why a qui tam action has not been filed against Obama and the insurers as a conspiracy to defraud the government. Certainly what he was conspiring to get them to agree with, besides being illegal, would have increased the risks to the program, which the federal government apparently has to indemnify the insurers for.


7 posted on 11/22/2013 2:11:55 PM PST by kaehurowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson