Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Who's the intolerant bigot? The lesbian sister
Renew America ^ | 11-19-13 | Bryan Fischer

Posted on 11/21/2013 5:39:06 PM PST by ReformationFan

The meanstream media has been all atwitter this week over the spat between the Cheney sisters – Liz, a candidate for the U.S. Senate in Wyoming, and her lesbian sister Mary – regarding same-sex marriage. Actually, you can't even call this a spat, since only one of the two sisters is bickering with the other in this little family war.

And the one doing the sniping here is not the heterosexual, happily-married, Christian sister. The one who is lobbing the grenades here is her perpetually aggrieved, sexually-confused, gay-activist sibling.

I'm not sure what you call it when one sister is trying to pick a very public fight with the other, and the second sister won't fight back, but instead turns the other cheek, just as Jesus taught. I would call it intolerance and bigotry and a form of bullying.

In other words, Liz Cheney is not the intolerant bigot here. Mary Cheney is.

(Excerpt) Read more at renewamerica.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bryanfischer; homonaziagenda; homosexualagenda; intolerantlesbian; lesbonaziagenda; lesbonazism; misscheney; missmarycheney; mrslizcheney; spoiledbrat
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last
Of course this may all be political theater, but if it's true then Miss(since she can't possibly be "Mrs." in the eyes of God) Mary Cheney sounds like a self-absorbed brat to me.
1 posted on 11/21/2013 5:39:06 PM PST by ReformationFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ReformationFan

Gays are by & large are utterly incapable of brooking any disagreement on the issue of acceptance or nonacceptance of homosexuality.


2 posted on 11/21/2013 5:43:36 PM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ReformationFan

From my humble observatory, it appears the gay activist crowd are nothing more than self-absorbed, juvenile thugs with an attitude. Considering they’re about 1 to 2% of the population, this really ticks a lot of us off.


3 posted on 11/21/2013 5:45:21 PM PST by MasterGunner01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ReformationFan

One tip that may come in handy this holiday season: stay out of family quarrels.


4 posted on 11/21/2013 5:47:20 PM PST by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skeeter
Gays are by & large are utterly incapable of brooking any disagreement on the issue of acceptance or nonacceptance of homosexuality.

That's because they seek to impose conformity of thought on other people. This, in turn, is because they are extremely unhappy... and believe their unhappiness results from the thoughts of other people.

They believe that only by changing the thought patterns of their friends, neighbors and family members can they become happy.

5 posted on 11/21/2013 5:50:12 PM PST by Steely Tom (If the Constitution can be a living document, I guess a corporation can be a person.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ReformationFan

This is the worst kind of political lie, a fake family feud when they both support gay marriage.

Liz Cheney has been promoting gay marriage and gays in the military for years, she opposed DOMA and a constitutional amendment.

Dick Cheney is even playing in this game, and he wanted to openly support gay marriage during the 2000 campaign.


6 posted on 11/21/2013 6:08:08 PM PST by ansel12 ( Democrats-"a party that since antebellum times has been bent on the dishonoring of humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ReformationFan

I wouldn’t take sides. I wouldn’t trust her for a second on the issues.


7 posted on 11/21/2013 6:11:12 PM PST by GeronL (Extra Large Cheesy Over-Stuffed Hobbit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

It’s pathetic when politicians and other public figures, who their whole lives opposed gay marriage for a myriad of good reasons, feel they need to twist themselves into pretzels espousing what they know is wrong, just because they have a child who is gender-confused and militantly insisting everyone applaud the unapplaudible. These politicians and other public figures becomes a pathetic quaking characters afraid to stand up for logic and their real convictions. At that point these politicians, trying to seem what they are not, become useless to themselves and those who had believed the politicians had a steadfast moral compass. They are victims of the homosexual agenda, which wants everyone to think the same as they do. The propagandists will not spare their own family members. They are thought control police.


8 posted on 11/21/2013 6:25:13 PM PST by Seeing More Clearly Now
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ReformationFan

Please, no pictures of Mary Cheney’s mate......


9 posted on 11/21/2013 6:36:14 PM PST by dragonblustar (Psalm 37:7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seeing More Clearly Now

That doesn’t describe the Cheneys, they really do support the homosexual agenda, Liz has supported it for years, and Dick actually wanted to run on it in 2000 because he believed so strongly that America needed gay marriage, and the homosexual agenda.

05/09/2012 ——Gay Conservative Groups: Good Obama Adopted (DICK)Cheney Position On Same-Sex Marriage:
“”Both groups, Log Cabin Republicans and GOProud, also made specific mention of former Vice President Dick Cheney, downplaying Obama’s statement because the Republican embraced same-sex marriage first.””

07/30/12——Dick Cheney Defends His Silence On Gay Marriage In 2000:
“”WASHINGTON — Dick Cheney says he didn’t see the point of raising the issue of gay marriage in the 2000 presidential campaign, even though he supported it.
The former vice president suggested it wouldn’t have done much good and probably would have sunk President George W. Bush’s prospects for office.””

02/17/2012——Dick Cheney Part Of Marriage Equality Lobbying Effort In Maryland: Report:
“”WASHINGTON — Dick Cheney is part of a lobbying campaign to convince at least one Maryland state lawmaker to back marriage equality, the Baltimore Sun reported on Thursday. Since leaving the vice president’s office, Cheney has been increasingly vocal in his support for same-sex marriage, but the extent of his engagement on the issue was not previously well known.””


10 posted on 11/21/2013 6:43:32 PM PST by ansel12 ( Democrats-"a party that since antebellum times has been bent on the dishonoring of humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom; skeeter

Which is why they make a perfect “victim” group for leftists and democrats, i.e. believers in so-called “positive rights” which are no true rights at all. If one needs the absolute affirmation of everyone else around him, he is putting demands and obligations upon others that take away their negative rights which are the only true rights there are.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gXOEkj6Jz44

If homosexuals truly believed what they were doing was right then they wouldn’t care what anyone else thought of them.


11 posted on 11/21/2013 6:55:39 PM PST by ReformationFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

BINGO.

It’s all BS.


12 posted on 11/21/2013 7:03:42 PM PST by Venturer (Keep Obama and you aint seen nothing yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

Did Dick Cheney promote this agenda before his daughter declared herself?


13 posted on 11/21/2013 7:11:55 PM PST by Seeing More Clearly Now
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Seeing More Clearly Now

We do know that it goes back for close to 15 years, it is clear what he believes in.

We also have years of Liz Cheney supporting the homosexual agenda.


14 posted on 11/21/2013 8:51:59 PM PST by ansel12 ( Democrats-"a party that since antebellum times has been bent on the dishonoring of humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ReformationFan

It is theater. Liz and the whole family is for “gay rights”. She’s desperately trying to lie her way to victory in Wyoming.


15 posted on 11/21/2013 9:09:37 PM PST by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ReformationFan

If one accepted their homosexuality, then they would do something else offensive, while looking over at you, saying with their eyes, “How about this, do I have your goat now?”


16 posted on 11/22/2013 1:42:16 AM PST by donmeaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

What we still don’t know or have evidence for is whether the parents thought the same way their daughter chose that path.


17 posted on 11/22/2013 11:52:20 AM PST by Seeing More Clearly Now
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Impy

I figure it is. I will never vote for another Cheney ever.

If a situation like this were true, I’d still say the lesbian sister was an obnoxious brat.


18 posted on 11/22/2013 4:00:28 PM PST by ReformationFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Seeing More Clearly Now

We do know going back at least 15 years, we know more about how the Cheneys believed in “gay marriage” than just about any other politicians.

Wanting to campaign on the homosexual agenda to the republican base in 2000, is as strong as it gets, perhaps if you are just totally obsessed with how Dick Cheney felt about the concept of “gay marriage” in the 1970s, or 1980s, you could try doing what sounds to me, like impossible research.


19 posted on 11/22/2013 4:35:59 PM PST by ansel12 ( Democrats-"a party that since antebellum times has been bent on the dishonoring of humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

‘how Dick Cheney felt about the concept of “gay marriage” in the 1970s, or 1980s, you could try doing what sounds to me, like impossible research.’

I lived in the 1970s and 1980s and such a concept was unthinkable for the vast majority of us back then.


20 posted on 11/22/2013 7:47:01 PM PST by ReformationFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson