Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: george76

no more common sense. we need wolves why????


2 posted on 11/21/2013 11:50:30 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Sacajaweau
no more common sense. we need wolves why????

Same reason we need to import Al Qaeda.

3 posted on 11/21/2013 11:53:11 AM PST by Steely Tom (If the Constitution can be a living document, I guess a corporation can be a person.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Sacajaweau
no more common sense. we need wolves why????

Because.

5 posted on 11/21/2013 11:53:41 AM PST by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: Ignorance On Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Sacajaweau

I don’t have a great deal of sympathy for Catron County welfare ranches.


7 posted on 11/21/2013 11:55:23 AM PST by altsehastiin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Sacajaweau

To bankrupt family farmers and ranchers


8 posted on 11/21/2013 11:55:52 AM PST by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Sacajaweau

Actually wolves very rarely attack humans, they are so afraid of the human scent I wonder how they were domesticated into dogs in the first place.


21 posted on 11/21/2013 12:19:44 PM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Sacajaweau

Diversity!!


23 posted on 11/21/2013 12:21:47 PM PST by Trailerpark Badass (There should be a whole lot more going on than throwing bleach, said one woman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Sacajaweau
"no more common sense. we need wolves why????"

because Grandma is costing Obamacare too much?

My what a big law you have!

26 posted on 11/21/2013 12:23:23 PM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Sacajaweau
"no more common sense. we need wolves why????"

because Grandma is costing Obamacare too much?

My what a big law you have!

27 posted on 11/21/2013 12:23:23 PM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Sacajaweau

“we need wolves why????”

Too speed along the implementation of UN Agenda 21, the depopulation of vast swaths of the American landscape and herd everyone into manageable cities.


32 posted on 11/21/2013 12:32:57 PM PST by Rebelbase (Tagline: optional, printed after your name on post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Sacajaweau

Here is the logic for wolf re-introduction. I was curious to find out the reasoning even if it might be wrong>>>>>>
;
;
;
;
WIKIPEDIA
Indeed, local industry and environmental groups battled for decades over the Yellowstone and Idaho wolf reintroduction effort. The idea of wolf reintroduction was first brought to Congress in 1966 by biologists who were concerned with the critically high elk populations in Yellowstone and the ecological damages to the land from excessively large herds. Officially, 1926 was the year that the last wolves were killed within Yellowstone’s boundaries. When the wolves were eradicated and hunting eliminated, the elk population boomed. Over the succeeding decades, elk populations grew so large that they unbalanced the local ecosystem. The number of elk and other large prey animals increased to the point that they gathered in large herds along valley bottoms and meadows overgrazing new-growth vegetation. Because of overgrazing, deciduous woody plant species such as upland aspen and riparian cottonwood became seriously diminished. So, because the keystone predators, the wolves, had been removed from the Yellowstone-Idaho ecosystem, the ecosystem changed. This change affected other species as well. Coyotes filled in the niche left by wolves, but couldn’t control the large ungulate populations. Booming coyote numbers, furthermore, also had a negative effect on other species, particularly the red fox, pronghorn, and domestic sheep. Ranchers, though, remained steadfastly opposed to reintroducing a species of animal that they considered to be analogous to a plague, citing the hardships that would ensue with the potential loss of stock caused by wolves.[3]


55 posted on 11/21/2013 2:17:43 PM PST by dennisw (The first principle is to find out who you are then you can achieve anything -- Buddhist monk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Sacajaweau
they should be reintroduced into the neighborhoods of those that want them reintroduced. Put a pack introduced to Central Park in NY.Find out where they all live and give them their very own pack of wolves....lets relocate them so the idiots can enjoy the wolves eating their kids as they walk home from school. They will love it...At one time wolves were in every part of the country...Just putting them in the west is so unfair to the east coast and all their cities..

Or lets put it up to a vote.

68 posted on 11/22/2013 11:03:07 AM PST by goat granny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Sacajaweau

Well I have a collection of suppressed rifles. I can de- introduce them


101 posted on 11/24/2013 1:45:41 PM PST by TheThirdRuffian (RINOS like Romney, McCain, Christie are sure losers. No more!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson