Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kimberly GG
Is the Gettysburg Address subject to interpretation?

There are several versions floating around and I heard someone say that Lincoln 'did not actually use the name of God'. Below is what was printed in the Chicago Tribune the next day:


41 posted on 11/19/2013 5:31:20 PM PST by Mike Darancette (Do The Math)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Mike Darancette

Thank you.


44 posted on 11/19/2013 5:38:35 PM PST by EveningStar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

To: Mike Darancette

Wikipedia says that printing is from the New York Times (and that they were a Republican-leaning paper then!). They also mention what the Democrats of the day thought of the speech...

The Democratic-leaning Chicago Times observed, “The cheek of every American must tingle with shame as he reads the silly, flat and dishwatery utterances of the man who has to be pointed out to intelligent foreigners as the President of the United States.”[60]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gettysburg_Address


52 posted on 11/19/2013 6:35:55 PM PST by JediJones (The #1 Must-see Filibuster of the Year: TEXAS TED AND THE CONSERVATIVE CRUZ-ADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

To: Mike Darancette

Thanks for the reprint. The Gettysburg Address is the one actually given. And that one had under God in it.


63 posted on 11/19/2013 9:07:52 PM PST by nonsporting
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson