Posted on 11/19/2013 10:35:49 AM PST by moonshinner_09
When Eisenhower was president some illegals were deported via ship. When the vessel finally docked in Mexico and the illegals disembarked, they all complained of seasickness. Also, a lot of them couldn’t swim and were terrified to be out on the water.
Sound like a good method to send folks back to where they originated.
http://cis.org/myth-law-abiding-illegal-alien
The myth of the otherwise law abiding illegal alien.
They are committing all kinds of fraud and are trying to steal Government services.
Only the U.S. No other.
Solution: Arrest and deport the protesting illegals.
“Solution: Arrest and deport the protesting illegals.”
The only real solution is to remove the drawing card of jobs and benefits. Take the CEO or owner of one company in every state that employs illegals and send them off to prison at hard labor breaking big rocks into little rocks for several years. Send the politicians who support law breaking, city mayors, bureaucrats and welfare hacks to the same prison. End the un-Constitutional anchor baby philosophy.
Voila, they will go home and end the burden on taxpayers almost overnight, and on their own dime. We must start making examples out of big shots, of which the failure of has become an America character defect.
How about both?
ok then bigshot....you’re the first contestant on back to mexico!
Start out at the ROOT, not the leaves...
How about, instead of CEO’s (whom don’t usually do the hiring), we round up the politicians/police/etc. whom DON’T/WON’T enforce the law and ‘send them off to prison at hard labor breaking big rocks into little rocks for several years.’ And, at the same time, round up and deport as we find ‘em (building the wall and a ‘no man’s land’ in the process)
News > National News
Exclusive: US May Have Let ‘Dozens’ of Terrorists in as Refugees
8:50AM Wednesday
November 20, 2013
Exclusive: US May Have Let ‘Dozens’ of Terrorists in as Refugees (Photo Credit: FBI)
(QUANTICO, Va.) — Several dozen suspected terrorist bombmakers, including some believed to have targeted American troops, may have mistakenly been allowed to move to the United States as war refugees, according to FBI agents investigating the remnants of roadside bombs recovered from Iraq and Afghanistan.
The discovery in 2009 of two al Qaeda-Iraq terrorists living as refugees in Bowling Green, Ky. — who later admitted in court that they’d attacked U.S. soldiers in Iraq — prompted the bureau to assign hundreds of specialists to an around-the-clock effort aimed at checking its archive of 100,000 improvised explosive devices collected in the war zones, known as IEDs, for other suspected terrorists’ fingerprints.
“We are currently supporting dozens of current counter-terrorism investigations like that,” FBI Agent Gregory Carl, director of the Terrorist Explosive Device Analytical Center (TEDAC), said in an ABC News interview to be broadcast Wednesday night on ABC News’ World News with Diane Sawyer and Nightline.
“I wouldn’t be surprised if there were many more than that,” said House Committee on Homeland Security Chairman Michael McCaul. “And these are trained terrorists in the art of bombmaking that are inside the United States; and quite frankly, from a homeland security perspective, that really concerns me.”
As a result of the Kentucky case, the State Department stopped processing Iraq refugees for six months in 2011, federal officials told ABC News — even for many who had heroically helped U.S. forces as interpreters and intelligence assets. One Iraqi who had aided American troops was assassinated before his refugee application could be processed, because of the immigration delays, two U.S. officials said. In 2011, fewer than 10,000 Iraqis were resettled as refugees in the U.S., half the number from the year before, State Department statistics show.
An intelligence tip initially led the FBI to Waad Ramadan Alwan, 32, in 2009. The Iraqi had claimed to be a refugee who faced persecution back home — a story that shattered when the FBI found his fingerprints on a cordless phone base that U.S. soldiers dug up in a gravel pile south of Bayji, Iraq on Sept. 1, 2005. The phone base had been wired to unexploded bombs buried in a nearby road...
Excellent idea!
Marcel Ledbetter with a big Stihl.
The Chinese were certainly right—one picture is worth a thousand words.
[:-0
“And, at the same time, round up and deport as we find ‘em (building the wall and a ‘no man’s land’ in the process)”
The liberals have consistently used “round up and deport” against the no-amnesty movement claiming it is just wrong to do this (note: I don’t). But I also think it is much more cost effective to shut down the jobs and benefits, and have them go back home on their dime, just as many did in 2009.
When it comes to borders, fences and no man’s land there is a small cynical part of me that understands that fences can ultimately work two ways, and there may become a time when Americans may wish to leave what was a “free” country, just like the Germans in what became East Germany. I still think physical controls are necessary between nations with disparate cultures.
Unfortunately our USA culture has been purposely changed by the NYC urban elites starting in the 1965 Immigration Act.
I am getting tired of the deportation game. They pay less to get back in than we spend getting them out.
Better would be to deny them any government services, to include no investigation of crimes against them.
Then they could start to find out what ‘outlaw’ meant, and private parties could offer bounties, local counties could have contests.
Benefits, yes, but enforcing this ‘only Americans’ ideal too is akin to a police state (your papers please). ‘Jobs’ belong to the employer/business, I see no reason to interfere with whomever they wish to employ, for whatever reason.
Let me preface the above: As a (L) I’d have MINIMAL taxes/etc. Schools would be paid by parents, there would be NO S.S., Medicaid, etc. (outside States)....IOW, there would be little reason for someone to come here unless they WANTED to, there would be NO Fed. freebies.
I understand your point re: wall. But, if the millions can stream in, I don’t see any reason the reverse would be as hard :)
Thanks for the reply. No one cares what I think or for that matter what you think. In the end it comes down to what the few elite billionaires who would sell out our USA sovereignty to China for more profit, and who own politicians think.
Politics and ideology, is irrelevant for most and unless we are controlling vast sums of political capital and socialist donations it makes no difference.
OUR USA sovereignty is of the utmost importance because we average Americans should determine the fate of America..
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.