Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/19/2013 7:49:18 AM PST by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last
To: Clint N. Suhks
The Gettysburg Address, as telepromptered by Barack Hussein Obama on the website http://www.learntheaddress.org:

"...that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain - that this the nation under God shall have a new birth of freedom..."

40 posted on 11/19/2013 8:15:57 AM PST by Dr.Deth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clint N. Suhks
So here's the defense you're going to hear on this (I predict). Obama was using an early draft of the speech (written by John G. Nicolay, President Lincoln's personal secretary). In fact, he read this word for word.

Note the difference between this initial version and the accepted, spoken one....

NICOLAY: "It is rather for us, the living, we here be dedicated to the great task remaining before us – that, from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they here, gave the last full measure of devotion – that we here highly resolve these dead shall not have died in vain; that the nation, shall have a new birth of freedom"

LINCOLN: "It is for us the living, rather, to be dedicated here to the unfinished work which they who fought here have thus far so nobly advanced. It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us -- that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion -- that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain -- that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom"

My opinion is that Obama specifically chose this early draft because of its omission of the phrase UNDER GOD.

41 posted on 11/19/2013 8:17:08 AM PST by GreenAccord (Bacon Akbar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clint N. Suhks

Barry is a Revisionista.


48 posted on 11/19/2013 8:22:28 AM PST by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clint N. Suhks
(IMHO :)...the teleprompter had ALLAH instead of G*D, but...
pResident 0'ButtCrack "misspoke" again for political reasons.

50 posted on 11/19/2013 8:23:26 AM PST by skinkinthegrass (who'll take tomorrow,$pend it all today;who can take your income & tax it all away..0'Blowfly can :-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clint N. Suhks

I’m definitely not a religious guy, but am offended that 0bama would remove “under God” from his recitation because it’s offensive to the vast majority of Americans who believe in God and because it was a part of the speech as given by Lincoln. A proper recitation is all that was asked of Zero and he couldn’t even get that right. What a horrible person! I’m to the point where I’d be okay with Biden taking over for the rest of the 2nd term.


55 posted on 11/19/2013 8:26:23 AM PST by Two Kids' Dad (((( ))))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clint N. Suhks

What a great leader the dumb-o-crats follow.


58 posted on 11/19/2013 8:28:33 AM PST by chiefqc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clint N. Suhks

Interesting given that of the five copies written by Lincoln himself the first two drafts (the Nicolay and Hay copies, respectively) lacked “under God”. The later three copies (Everett, Bancroft and Bliss copies -the Bliss copy being the one Lincoln signed and dated) did have it.

The argument may be that since there’s no conclusive proof of what Lincoln actually spoke, they decided to go with the wording of the two drafts rather than the three post speech copies.


60 posted on 11/19/2013 8:29:35 AM PST by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clint N. Suhks

By the way, even the Wikipedia version has “under God” in it, so even some low-level clerk would have been able to retrieve the proper version for him at a moment’s notice.


62 posted on 11/19/2013 8:31:52 AM PST by Two Kids' Dad (((( ))))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clint N. Suhks
But Jeremiah Wright and NBC have assured me that this anti-Christ...oops...I mean 0bama, is a Christian.

They wouldn't try to deceive, would they?

63 posted on 11/19/2013 8:32:44 AM PST by mojito (Zero, our Nero.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clint N. Suhks

Of course he didn’t want to use God’s holy name.

Obama’s big boss—the Earl of Hell—doesn’t like people using that word.


71 posted on 11/19/2013 8:40:26 AM PST by dsc (Any attempt to move a government to the left is a crime against humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clint N. Suhks

It was just a muslim slip.


73 posted on 11/19/2013 8:42:36 AM PST by bgill (This reply was mined before it was posted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clint N. Suhks
King Barry absent for the 150th anniversary event at Gettysburg. King Barry drops 'God' from Gettysburg address.

This confirms he is neither American, nor Christian. As a lame duck he's no longer concerned with maintaining the lie that he's either of these things.

74 posted on 11/19/2013 8:42:37 AM PST by Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America (If Americans were as concerned for their country as Egyptians are, Obama would be ousted!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clint N. Suhks
Obama omitted the words "under God"

secular humanists think that the state is god

75 posted on 11/19/2013 8:42:42 AM PST by mjp ((pro-{God, reality, reason, egoism, individualism, natural rights, limited government, capitalism}))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clint N. Suhks

To the churchgoing black voters who believed this man’s lie that he is a practicing Christian (raised in several agnostic/muslim households)... SUCKERS!


77 posted on 11/19/2013 8:44:37 AM PST by a fool in paradise (America 2013 - STUCK ON STUPID)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clint N. Suhks

Obama needs prayers.


83 posted on 11/19/2013 9:05:00 AM PST by petitfour
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clint N. Suhks

He’ll be REAL sorry on the Day of Judgement!


84 posted on 11/19/2013 9:05:07 AM PST by PATRIOT1876
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clint N. Suhks

...unexpectedly...


86 posted on 11/19/2013 9:07:03 AM PST by null and void (I'm betting on an Obama Trifecta: A Nobel Peace Prize, an Impeachment, AND a War Crimes Trial...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clint N. Suhks

He’s done it before. The media don’t report it, and so the media prove that they are 100% in agreement with that, and that they are as anti-American and marxist as the big chief.


89 posted on 11/19/2013 9:18:13 AM PST by I want the USA back (Media: completely irresponsible traitors. Complicit in the destruction of our country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clint N. Suhks

He really wanted to insert Allah instead, but he’s Christian you know.


94 posted on 11/19/2013 9:24:01 AM PST by Old Yeller (Obama: A dark spot in this country's history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clint N. Suhks

And the liberals are so proud of him for it.


95 posted on 11/19/2013 9:24:39 AM PST by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson