Posted on 11/10/2013 6:50:53 AM PST by IbJensen
“Access to power,” Plato said in The Republic, “must be confined to men who are not in love with it.” I think that’s pretty good advice, and I wish our masters in Washington were a bit better at following it than they are. It is a curious irony that the burning desire for high office is a disqualifying character trait for the beneficent exercise of high office. But we see corroborative evidence of that irony all around us.
More from Plato: “All goes wrong when, starved for lack of anything good in their own lives, men turn to public affairs hoping to snatch from thence the happiness they hunger for. They set about fighting for power, and this internecine conflict ruins them and their country.” Plato could be pretty obscure, but here he speaks with arresting clarity.
I don’t suppose that President Obama has much occasion to ponder the writings of Plato. That’s probably just as well, since Plato’s fantasy about the abolition of private property and the cultivation of a class of Guardians who ruled through a mixture of coercion and dissimulation might give him ideas—not, I think, that he needs any more than he already has. Pop quiz: Plato or Obama? “If anyone is to practice deception, either on the country’s enemies or on its citizens, it must be the Rulers of the commonwealth, acting for its benefit.”
As it happens, that one is Plato. But it takes a sharp man to tell. I think Obama would find a lot to savor in The Republic. What do you think? “If you like your health-care plan, you will be able to keep your health-care plan. Period.”
That’s what President Obama said, repeatedly (at least 36 times), when selling ObamaCare to a skeptical public. “If you like your plan, you can keep your plan. Period”
Turns out, of course, that when he said “period,” he meant “gotcha.” No one yet knows the extent of the damage caused from ObamaCare. One recent report estimates that more than 50 million Americans will be forced out of their current health care plans by ObamaCare. But although we do not yet know the extent of the damage—how many lives will be blighted or lost—because of ObamaCare, we know for a certainty that the legislation was sold to us on false pretenses. “If you like your plan, you can keep your plan.” There was never any chance of that, as numerous critics pointed out at the time. They knew it could never be, and so did Obama.
Does it matter? Does anyone really care whether the president of the United States ostentatiously breaks a promise he made publicly on at least 36 separate occasions? We know what would happen if the president of an insurance company made and then flagrantly broke a promise that his customers could keep their health care coverage if they liked it. He would be prosecuted and jailed.
Making and breaking a promise like that is what the law calls “fraud,” and as Andy McCarthy points out today in “Obama’s Massive Fraud,” the law takes a dim view of fraud because it erodes the trust upon which civilized life depends. “Fraud,” Andy notes,
is a serious federal felony, usually punishable by up to 20 years’ imprisonment — with every repetition of a fraudulent communication chargeable as a separate crime. In computing sentences, federal sentencing guidelines factor in such considerations as the dollar value of the fraud, the number of victims, and the degree to which the offender’s treachery breaches any special fiduciary duties he owes. Cases of multi-million-dollar corporate frauds — to say nothing of multi-billion-dollar, Bernie Madoff–level scams that nevertheless pale beside Obamacare’s dimensions — often result in terms amounting to decades in the slammer.
Bernie Madoff will be probably cooling his heels as the government’s guest for the duration of his life. And Obama? Nothing but nothing will happen to him. Still, it is interesting (if also depressing) to ask why. Andy McCarthy reminds us that Obama knew at least three years ago that the Affordable Care Act would force millions of people out of their insurance plans. But “the president hid the data”—just as various financial institutions hid data from their investors about the risky mortgage-backed securities they were peddling. The difference is that those financial institutions are being sued by the Justice Department while President Obama . . . well, you know.
Once again, Obama has managed to astonish me. I thought people would be rioting in the streets over this example of what Andy McCarthy rightly calls “massive fraud.” But, no. His popularity has ticked down a bit more. Some of his vulnerable Democrat colleagues are panicking a little as they prepare to face what is certain to be a hostile electorate. But what will happen?
Probably nothing much. Which is too bad. The other day, I went to a launch party for David Horowitz’s new book The Black Book of the American Left. In the course of his remarks, David made a point I have several times made in this space: ObamaCare is only incidentally about health care. At bottom, it is about control—more specifically, it is about the federal government’s control of the lives of its citizens. That, indeed, is why the Internal Revenue Service has been enlisted to enforce the provision of this monstrous piece of legislation. This government agency, which was brought into being to collect taxes, has in intervening decades become an important instrument of governmental coercion. ObamaCare was custom-made for an agency like the modern IRS: meddlesome, bureaucratic, and minatory.
My friend Robert Bork was fond of quoting Justice Scalia’s mournful observation that “day by day, case by case, [the Supreme Court] is busy designing a Constitution for a country I do not recognize.” People tend to think that revolutions are violent and dramatic occurrences. Sometimes they are. But sometimes they happen almost by stealth, an imposition here, a regulation there, an ancient habit of probity or fair dealing quietly elided to make room for some new understanding of the relation between citizens and the state.
Over the last few years, the president of the United States has lied, publicly and repeatedly, about a matter of grave national importance to millions of people. His dishonesty, like Falstaff’s, is “gross as a mountain, open, palpable.” What will we, the people, do about it? I think Andy McCarthy is right when he suggests that it is “highly unlikely that Barack Obama will ever be impeached.” I am not so sure, however, that he is right that it is certain “that he will never again be trusted.” I wonder about that. Andy ends with the observation that “the American people will not think twice about taking out their frustration and mounting anger on those who collaborate in his schemes.” I’d like to think so. But I wonder about that, too.
Our Congress is utterly worthless. Our courts' system, especially the SOOPREME Kort, is complicit in the demise of a nation.
IMPEACH THIS CANCER AND CAST HIM OFF INTO THE DUSTBIN OF HISTORY!
Plato was an idiot. Jefferson had it right - water the tree of Liberty now and then.
The reality none of us want to deal with is we are well past “a country I don’t recognize”.
In 2010 Obama is on video admitting (to Republicans) that 8 to 9 million people might have to change coverage. (He says this in the early part of the video.)
That religion encourages lying. Just saying.
What great article! ....and very sobering & depressing for the eventual & certain destruction of our nation, while the traitors - 0dumb0, Reid, Pelosi, Sebellious, Hitlary & most of the demoCRAP party go scot free! And likely much richer & prosperous in their raping & pillaging & plunder of the American taxpayers. I look forward to seeing 0dumb0 & the socialist demoCRAPs & Rinos roasting in Hell for eternity!
Friedrich Hayek said much the same thing in "The Road to Serfdom". Essentially, that the people who most want power are generally the last ones you want to have any of it.
A refresher course on the White House Fable Factory’s greatest hits:
• Stanley Ann Dunham. Obama cited his mom’s deathbed fight with her insurer several times over the years to support the Obamacare ban on pre-existing condition exclusions by insurers. During a 2008 debate, he shared her plight: “For my mother to die of cancer at the age of 53 and have to spend the last months of her life in the hospital room arguing with insurance companies because they’re saying that this may be a pre-existing condition and they don’t have to pay her treatment, there’s something fundamentally wrong about that.” But New York Times reporter Janny Scott discovered that Dunham’s health insurer had in fact reimbursed her medical expenses with nary an objection. The actual coverage dispute centered on a separate disability insurance policy.
Roger Kimball gets it.
Oh God, help us.
Think Hitler towards the end of WWII.
Has the “shahada” ring been proven yet? Th last time I was researching it, all I could find was conjecture as to its meaning, interpretation, origin, etc.
At the time, i couldn’t find anything really concrete to prove it actually WAS a shahada ring, just a bunch of blurry pics people were enlarging to make their case. But that was a long time ago that I looked.
The reason i’ve been so skeptical is because I find it hard to believe that he would be stupid enough back in ‘08 to openly wear it, all the while claiming he was a Christian.
This is actually worse than fraud. Madoff didn’t force his victims to buy into his fraud with a threat of punishment if they didn’t do as he says.
As usual, we always think we can fix it a year from now at the next election. We should not count on that. To do so is delusional.
Already the talking head dems are out there saying they can fix it by going to single payer. Of course they never show you how horrible that would be.
Truth is, this failure was probably all planned to do exactly that. The old bait and switch. Except this time the product is worse than what you were baited with. The really, really good deal is bad, real bad even though we will chop off your leg if you refuse to buy, and the switch will be far worse. You could die!
Impeachment? Yes, and we should all be demanding it of those lily livered weak fools in DC. Yeah, I know, all they care about is getting elected, they already have their future secured off our backs.
Public schools.
Obama's Fourth Reich of Lies
I will read it by the end of the day. Thank you.
Amen, brother, I am hard put to assign a date to just when this country ceased to be recognizable as the same one in which I was born but it has to be decades in the past. At some point I realized and started to say to others that we had reached the point that what had been recognized as common sense as obvious to the normal person as the rising sun was called extremism or worse and the people running the country had started to sound like those who used to be committed to a hospital for the mentally defective. It was not recently.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.