Posted on 11/09/2013 4:17:23 AM PST by IbJensen
Pointing a finger and saying “bang!” isn’t the only thing that will get you in trouble in school today. Now it seems that just complaining about your child’s homework assignment can get a finger pointed at you — for being a neo-Nazi.
This is precisely what happened to Josh Barry of Camp Hill, Pennsylvania. And the kicker?
Barry is Jewish and married to a woman who is half-black and half-white.
The problems started when Barry reviewed a homework assignment in which his eighth-grade daughter’s East Pennsboro Middle School (EPMS) asked students to evaluate a New York Times article on the government shutdown. After reading the story, Barry reviewed questions his daughter was required to answer, a couple of which were, “To what issue do House Republican leaders insist on tying the federal budget?” and “Do you feel it is principled or irresponsible, for politicians to threaten a shutdown?” Given their nature and that students were provided no opposing news sources for balance, Barry concluded that the homework was “grossly slanted.” Fox43.com reports:
[Barry said,] “I don’t remember any time where anybody was threatening to shutdown the Government.”
So he vented his concerns by emailing the teacher and the school board.
Barry says, “They’re handing them an article and saying who’s responsible for the shutdown when the article blames Republicans for it.”
And what was Barry’s reward for being a vigilant parent?
Cydnee Cohen, president of the East Pennsboro Education Association, called a mutual Facebook friend and said, “We’re having some problems with a parent in our school district ... I would like to know — some of it [what Barry said] seems like he’s a neo-Nazi” (recording here).
So what did the father say to give Cohen this impression? Here are the complaints he sent the school as reported by Fox News’ Todd Starnes:
“It is safe to say that I am less than pleased with your non-objective approach to education when it pertains to current political discussions in the classroom,” he wrote. “You have a duty to be objective and your information you provided my child was not only grossly slanted but it is incompetently incomplete.”
He pointed out the questions in the lesson were loaded with political ideology and “pre-loaded with incorrect premises.”
The history teacher who issued the assignment to Barry’s daughter, Darin Yoder, then responded to Barry, writing that the goal wasn’t to “promote any political agenda but to work on non-fiction reading skills.” Considering this a dodge, Barry wrote back, “You will not indoctrinate my child.... If you are going to present articles with a slant to one side you are morally and ethically required to present the opposing views, to give an opportunity for the student, your captive audience, to come to their own conclusions,” reported Starnes.
EPMS’ principal, Stephen A. Andrejack, then took the offense, scheduling an appointment to discuss the matter with Barry and saying to him, among other things, “As a parent myself who raised four boys, I take great offense to what you said.”
There was no mention whether Mr. Barry should be offended that a school official would imply he might be a neo-Nazi.
As for Cydnee Cohen, upon being informed by the mutual friend via text messages that Barry was not only no neo-Nazi, he was also Jewish, she responded, “he went to bishop mcdevitt!!” (referring to a local Catholic school) and “he is tea party right wing!” Addressing these obvious biases, Barry said, “She’s been taught to associate people who question authority, who raise their fist in the air who say I believe in the Constitution, or don’t indoctrinate my child, as you’re automatically a Nazi.”
But Cohen simply reflects much wider thinking. For instance, Democrat congressman Alan Grayson and other leftists have long equated the Tea Party with the KKK. And just last month, Todd Starnes reported that “[s]oldiers attending a pre-deployment briefing at Fort Hood say they were told that evangelical Christians and members of the Tea Party were a threat to the nation and that any soldier donating to those groups would be subjected to punishment under the Uniform Code of Military Justice.” In addition, reporting a week ago on the findings of an “international study,” the Daily News suggested that gun ownership and pro-Second Amendment beliefs among whites — and “racism” — “go together.” The paper quoted study researcher Kerry O’Brien as stating, “There had already been research showing that ... blacks are more likely to be shot, so we thought there must be something happening between the concept of being black and some whites wanting guns.” There was no mention of the fact that 94 percent of black homicide victims are killed by other blacks.
Of course, many critics point out that it’s actually the anti-Second Amendment views of leftists that smack of Nazism. In fact, this point is illustrated well in a recently released book by author Stephen Halbrook entitled Gun Control in the Third Reich: Disarming the Jews and ‘Enemies of the State.
Speaking of enemies of the state brings us back to Cydnee Cohen, a woman so paranoid about a person’s possible Nazi leanings that she contacted one of his acquaintances asking for dirt on the man. One just has to wonder: Is the irony of this lost on her completely?
This twisted power-broker isso full of her own importance, and her infallibility, she can consider no other possibility than that this man, Jewish, is a neo-nazi.
I'd be amused to hear her definition of that term. I's also be pleased to provide her a few definitions of other terms. She mightn't like them, though.
When their actions are indefensible, they seek to attack those who point it out to put the one who dares question their authoritaih on the defensive.
It is amusing to me that they were so knee-jerk in their reaction they failed to find out a few seminal facts and ended up with egg on their faces.
They need to become more accustomed to being questioned, IMHO.
I am about to have a problem with my Granddaughters teacher. She gave her a revisionist tale about Columbus and the Spanish settlement of the Americas and she is about to get unloaded on. I have been reading History since I could pick up a book. I am going to lend her a few she might not like.
Do it! Good for you!
I always read my children’s textbooks to see if the publisher was coloring out of the lines.
The real Nazis are just doing a little psychological projection on the dissenters.
“Is the irony of this lost on her completely?”
I suspect the irony of this is lost on just about every Obamaton, and many Republicans as well.
Of course, Nazi racial theories are no longer popular with Democrats. The Democratic Party has become somewhat more civilized in this regard. It formally stopped promoting chattel slavery back in 1865, though Democrat did put their racial theories with the Jim Crow laws starting around 1876. Wilson ordered the racial segregation of Federal employees, but Truman reversed the order in 1948. It took about hundred years, but the Democratic Party eventually distanced itself from the KKK, which had been a core constituency under the leadership of the likes of Robert Byrd. Despite filibusters by the likes of Al Gore’s father and Bill Clinton’s political mentor, many Democrats joined Republicans in overturning the despicable Jim Crow laws that relegated many Americans to second-class citizenship based upon race.
Still, there are many Democrats in America who identify with all aspects of national socialism except for its racial theories (and, perhaps, its nationalism.) Some align with the economics of national socialism. Others align with the patriotic, state-worshipping culture of national socialism. National socialism’s military and surveillance focus offers a sense of security for yet some others. And, of course, many Democrats understand the usefulness of the public education system to indoctrinating the next generation of Americans in the tenets of socialism. Only a tiny neo-Nazi lunatic fringe still identifies with the Democratic Party’s old racial theories.
The whole idea of the Tea Party, which is a unorganized movement rather than an organized political party, is antithetical to national socialism. It advocates the old American values of self-reliance and responsibility, individual liberty and constitutionally limited government. The Tea Party’s idea of patriotism is similar to Mark Twain’s: “Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.” Though it respects the government, it does not worship the government; it does not look to government as its sufficiency and strength. The Tea Party movement is as diametrically opposite from any sort of neo-Nazism as it is from Obamunism.
“Barry is Jewish and married to a woman who is half-black and half-white. “
This statement is unacceptable. It assumes that a person’s ideology is determined by his ethnicity, and the race of a chosen marriage partner.
I think what they are getting at is that no "real" neo-nazi would be Jewish and in a mixed-race marriage.
These teachers should all read Tale of Two Cities again (if, in fact, they actually read it the first time). They’ve all become DeFarge’s and the irony IS completely lost on them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.