After years of posting on FR, the fall back position of the Pro-Police State is very often accusing the “other guy” of having a record. That’s not being snarky, that is me being informative.
I have seen your post, or posts like it so often it just makes me laugh when I see somebody try to use this device:
The fact that a person who opposes overarching tyrannical police powers is evidence of a police record.
It is a tiresome non sequitur.
Who is the "Pro-Police State"?
that is me being informative
No, it is you being a snarky drama queen.
The fact that a person who opposes overarching tyrannical police powers is evidence of a police record.
Is your name David W. Eckert? http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/11/07/new-details-emerge-about-new-mexico-man-at-center-of-police-departments-anal-probing-controversy/
You are uninformed.