[elhombrelibre]

I actually thought CNN’s coverage had been much better than in 30 years.

[ImJustAnotherOkie]

Of course it will be bad news. The libs are expert at burying their head in the sand. If CNN pulls their head out of the sand, they’ll change the channel lickity split.

[Uncle Miltie]

I love this pic:

[Lazamataz]

New York Times: "Hey. CNN. You've been... errrr... COVERIN' real news lately.... shame if anything wuz to happen to you'se guys RATIN'S......"

[ontap]

CNN is a half ass liberal station....conservatives have no use for them and the dims go to MSNBC.

[Zuben Elgenubi]

I wonder what Candy Crowley thinks of Governor Christie?

[Zuben Elgenubi]

nick, I forgot to include that this Thursday CNN is broadcasting a program at 9pm, about a number of scientists who are fed up with the "old timer" environmentalists. They posit that the new generation has to move forward, take leadership roles in the environmental movement and promote nuclear power, not sunbeams.

No kidding. On CNN.

[5thGenTexan]

The problem is CNN has been so liberal so long that almost no right leaning people watch it anymore. Only liberals watch it. So if they have to cover something the liberals don’t want to hear - they are toast.

[jeffc]

So the “news” media people finally openly admit to policing their own when it comes to bad news about the Zero King!

[NEMDF]

WOW. 385,000 is not really very many people. Think if they had the same number of viewers as the number of people who are losing their health insurance?

[Fido969]

The New York Times' Bill Carter suggests that's thanks to too much coverage of the troubled Obamacare launch

lol. Too much Obamacare isn't hurting Fox.