Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

State senators hold public meetings on proposal to nullify Obamacare in S.C.
The Post and Courier ^ | November 4, 2013 | Lauren Sausser

Posted on 11/05/2013 12:40:23 AM PST by Mount Athos

A group of state senators will host three public meetings this week, including one in North Charleston, on proposed legislation that would nullify Obamacare in South Carolina.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 2012 that the Affordable Care Act is constitutional, but S.C. House Bill 3101, also called the “Freedom of Health Care Protection Act,” would make enforcing parts of it illegal in South Carolina regardless of the high court’s decision.

The proposed bill argues that the Affordable Care Act has exceeded the scope of powers granted to the federal government by the Constitution. It would establish criminal and civil penalties for anyone who attempts to enforce certain provisions of Obamacare in this state.

The Supremacy Clause of the Constitution defines the founding document and the laws of the United States as “the supreme Law of the Land.”

Most constitutional scholars agree that federal laws trump state laws, but nullification supporters argue differently.

The Bill of Rights’ 10th Amendment specifies that powers not regulated to the United States by the Constitution are reserved for the states.

The “Freedom of Health Care Protection Act,” citing the 10th Amendment, would prohibit South Carolina from creating a health insurance exchange and would establish a tax deduction for any South Carolinian who is fined by the federal government for not purchasing health insurance — a new requirement under federal law.

Most individuals who cannot prove they are insured next year will face a $95 penalty.

The proposed bill passed the S.C. House of Representatives in May. The state Senate is scheduled to debate the legislation when the General Assembly reconvenes in January, after it debates ethics reform.

“It’s the No. 2 thing we take up when we get to Columbia,” said Sen. Tom Davis, R-Beaufort, chairman of a select committee organizing the public meetings on the bill. “It’s my job as chairman of this committee to provide a full range of how states are pushing back against the Affordable Care Act.”

The meetings will be held Tuesday and Wednesday in Columbia, Greenville and North Charleston. Members of the audience will have an opportunity to comment on the proposed bill at the meetings.

“They can hold these hearings, but it would much more impactful to stop playing politics with national wedge issues and focusing on the tea party base,” said Kristin Sosanie, a spokeswoman for the S.C. Democratic Party.

Sosanie said South Carolinians would be better served if the Legislature focused on creating jobs and passing an ethics reform bill.

“These are the types of things that are serving as distractions to things like ethics reform, which is really sorely needed,” she said.

It’s not known if Gov. Nikki Haley would sign the bill given the chance. Her office did not respond Monday to several requests for comment on the issue.

Tony Keck, director of the South Carolina Medicaid agency and an opponent of the Affordable Care Act, said the nullification bill, if passed and signed into law, could make it difficult for the state to draw federal funds for the Medicaid program.

More than half of the Medicaid program in South Carolina is paid for by the federal government.

If South Carolina nullified the federal health care law, there is “reason to be concerned” about that future funding, Keck said.

“We’ve been keeping an eye on the debate obviously,” he said.


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; US: South Carolina
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 11/05/2013 12:40:23 AM PST by Mount Athos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mount Athos
But, won't that offend Sen. Lindsey Graham? /sarc
2 posted on 11/05/2013 12:43:14 AM PST by Cowboy Bob (They are called "Liberals" because the word "parasite" was already taken.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mount Athos

The first Civil War started in South Carolina. Why not the 2nd?


3 posted on 11/05/2013 1:24:24 AM PST by tcrlaf (Well, it is what the Sheeple voted for....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

>> More than half of the Medicaid program in South Carolina is paid for by the federal government.

The federal government doesn’t pay for jack.

How much does the federal government tax the citizens of SC?


4 posted on 11/05/2013 1:30:44 AM PST by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mount Athos

The feds will say, “Okay, then you don’t get that $30 billion in road funds, that $18 billion in police aid, that $12 billion in infrastructure pork...”


5 posted on 11/05/2013 1:35:39 AM PST by Gen.Blather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gen.Blather

——The feds will say, “Okay, then you don’t get that $30 billion in road funds, that $18 billion in police aid, that $12 billion in infrastructure pork...”-——

SC can with hold ALL portions of the taxes due to the federal government paid by the citizens of SC like the fuel tax....

Two can play that game.....


6 posted on 11/05/2013 2:54:31 AM PST by Popman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Popman

“SC can with hold ALL portions of the taxes due to the federal government paid by the citizens of SC like the fuel tax....Two can play that game.....”

Probably not. You’ll probably find those taxes are paid directly from each seller, not from the state. The sellers are across-border companies and must comply or face other federal games.


7 posted on 11/05/2013 2:59:32 AM PST by Gen.Blather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mount Athos

Just pass the dam bill.
You can’t get into their game unless you play..

Then, and only then can you work from a higher level on any federal funding agreements or withholding federal taxes.

Quit playing around and do your job Senators.
What part of ‘The Bill of Rights’ 10th Amendment specifies that powers not regulated to the United States by the Constitution are reserved for the states....do y’all not understand..?????


8 posted on 11/05/2013 3:04:54 AM PST by triSranch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Popman

Hear,hear!


9 posted on 11/05/2013 4:43:19 AM PST by HANG THE EXPENSE (Life's tough.It's tougher when you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: triSranch

relegated


10 posted on 11/05/2013 4:45:49 AM PST by bdfromlv (Leavenworth hard time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mount Athos
“They can hold these hearings, but it would much more impactful to stop playing politics with national wedge issues and focusing on the tea party base,” said Kristin Sosanie, a spokeswoman for the S.C. Democratic Party.

Sosanie said South Carolinians would be better served if the Legislature focused on creating jobs and passing an ethics reform bill.

Ethics reform bill? How odd. A democrat wants to outlaw democrats!

11 posted on 11/05/2013 4:59:27 AM PST by John O (God Save America (Please))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson