Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Limbaugh: GOP Had No Desire To Win At Sebelius Hearing, "Afraid" Of Attacking Obama
www.realclearpolitics.com/ ^

Posted on 10/31/2013 8:32:26 AM PDT by ClaytonP

It's like they're afraid to. It's like there's still a fear of going after Obama, or going after Sebelius, just from the consultant level of the party or whoever's running the Republican Party. There seems to be some instruction that's gone out from on high to back off. "Don't even get close to making it look like it's personal! Don't be mean!" I'm at a loss. Well, no. I'm not at a loss to understand it. I know exactly what's going on. There is no Republican ideology is what is going on.

(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: rush
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

1 posted on 10/31/2013 8:32:26 AM PDT by ClaytonP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ClaytonP

I think its about .bribery.period


2 posted on 10/31/2013 8:34:35 AM PDT by seeker41 (take your country back by whatever means necessary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClaytonP

He keeps saying winning at the hearing. There is no winning. It is a hearing to see what happened and why it happened that the website was slow. Congress has hearings everyday and never heard it referred to winning and losing. Republicans lost when they didn’t do a thing to get rid of Obmacare. Sure Cruz talked on the floor for awhile and then voted to stop the further discussion. Today the government should be still closed if the Republicans really wanted to win. They lost New Jersey and about to lose Virginia. How many elections do these guys have to lose before they wake up. You can’t keep talking about 2010 election after election. Eventually you need to start winning elections again.


3 posted on 10/31/2013 8:35:40 AM PDT by napscoordinator ( Santorum-Bachmann 2016 for the future of the country!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClaytonP

If you are not part of the solution you are PART OF THE PROBLEM!!!


4 posted on 10/31/2013 8:37:03 AM PDT by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClaytonP

Actually, some good grilling of Kathleen did happen...probably after Rush said this. Rep Ellmers of NC nailed her pretty good on men and maternity coverage...


5 posted on 10/31/2013 8:37:25 AM PDT by C. Edmund Wright (Tokyo Rove is more than a name, it's a GREAT WEBSITE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClaytonP

The hearing was a big JOKE. Cheerleading by the Dem’s, gentle bashing by the GOP. WASTE of TIME.

Americans are the ones who will suffer and be caught in the middle. Especially those in treatment for life threatening illnesses right now. Caught in the middle. Through no fault of their own.

Shameful.


6 posted on 10/31/2013 8:40:12 AM PDT by Qwackertoo (Going into Politic Free Zone Momma Grizzly hibernation for a while after this week, maybe forever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClaytonP

Many of the Demorats took the opportunity to attack the GOP (with no response) in the few minutes they had to ostensibly question Sibelious.


7 posted on 10/31/2013 8:40:54 AM PDT by luvbach1 (We are finished.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClaytonP
I think that the NAS spies have blackmail information on all publicans. When Barry really screws up enough to get enough people to yell impeachment then people will come out of the woodwork to go after obama. Hillary would probably jump in for revenge and to make political points for her election.
8 posted on 10/31/2013 8:43:02 AM PDT by mountainlion (Live well for those that did not make it back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright

Yes, the parts I saw looked like she was being raked over the coals. And being pretty arrogant and insolent in return. Her words may have been contrite (somewhat, anyways), but in tone and demeanor were anything but.

Yesterday was just the start of a narrative changing long march. The website problems are just one element in this, and in fact are masking the severe structural flaws in the law. But even some of those are starting to show themselves. People need to be patient on this for the next 9 months or so ...


9 posted on 10/31/2013 8:43:39 AM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator
You can’t keep talking about 2010 election after election.

No one is talking about the 2010 election and how/why it was won. That is a major problem right there.

10 posted on 10/31/2013 8:46:02 AM PDT by frogjerk (We are conservatives. Not libertarians, not "fiscal conservatives", not moderates)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ClaytonP

That’s because the Pubbies and Dems are both collectivists. Why attack your friend?


11 posted on 10/31/2013 8:46:35 AM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (IÂ’m not a Republican, I'm a Conservative! Pubbies haven't been conservative since before T.R.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClaytonP

Yup, can’t beat up on the black guy or the woman


12 posted on 10/31/2013 8:46:45 AM PDT by Farnsworth (Now playing in America: "Stupid is the new normal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClaytonP

bump


13 posted on 10/31/2013 8:49:10 AM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClaytonP

The Republican party has lost their way and Rush right on the money.


14 posted on 10/31/2013 8:50:31 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright

Keyword (in your post) = “some”

Repubs should have gone into this hearing with an assiduously prepared list of “asking points” prepared by (but not specifically asked by) their top three attorneys, Trey Goudy and Ted Cruz (maybe he’s too nice and we’d be better off not sullying his image)

Point being, a skilled litigator knows how to ask question in a way that the witness can box themselves in and either perjure or discredit themselves. The idea that these series of questions would (in my image) have been asked by one senator, then another, then another, would have been even more effective.

Bottom line: The Repubs went into this hearing SPECTACULARLY and PATHETICALLY unprepared. (ask me if I am surprised)

I would frankly like to see Sebelius reduced to tears. That would have been a “war on women” image we could take to the bank.


15 posted on 10/31/2013 8:50:55 AM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (At no time was the Obama administration aware of what the Obama administration was doing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ClaytonP

RepubliCAN’Ts!


16 posted on 10/31/2013 8:52:15 AM PDT by Huskerfan44 (Huskerfan44 (22 Yr, Navy Vet))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright
The men/maternity issue could be useful, if the Republicans don't let the Obama folks portray it as a small problem that can be fixed. Which is what will happen if they try to just let ObamaCare fail and don't go all Ted Cruz about the larger issues.

We can't win by nit-picking, only by presenting better principles. If the we bring nits to the fight, and the Obama folks bring the principle of 'It's for the children', we lose even though they brought a stupid, incoherent principle.

The Republicans always choose the losing metaphor. If your opponent is falling, is commiting suicide, you don't just stand there and let them recover their balance or sanity - you push hard to make sure the verb tense is the past temse, they fell, they committed suicide.

If you aren't seen to be in the political fight, you are irrelevant to the fight.

17 posted on 10/31/2013 8:52:33 AM PDT by slowhandluke (It's hard to be cynical enough in this age.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ClaytonP
There is no Republican ideology is what is going on.

Wrong. The Republican ideology is identical to the Democrats. They only differ on style and tactics.

18 posted on 10/31/2013 8:54:25 AM PDT by Count of Monte Fisto (The foundation of modern society is the denial of reality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tanknetter

Yes, but she took full and complete responsibility for the screw ups. That means, of course, that she won’t resign, take a pay cut, or otherwise pay any price whatsoever for her foul up, but she takes responsibility.

What a joke!


19 posted on 10/31/2013 8:59:03 AM PDT by CitizenUSA (Conservatives are not anarchists!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: seeker41

Bribery or black mail?


20 posted on 10/31/2013 8:59:42 AM PDT by tractorman (I never miss a chance to tweak a liberal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson