Posted on 10/30/2013 7:02:00 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
It’s Mary Landrieu, who, until recently, was known to say how proud she is to have voted for ObamaCare and is now reduced to floating bills in the Senate that attempt to hold the president to the most basic promises he made when selling the bill.
She comes from solid-red Louisiana and is up for reelection next year, which is another way of saying that she too is deeply worried about losing something because of ObamaCare.
Sen. Mary Landrieu said Wednesday she would propose legislation to ensure all Americans could keep their existing insurance coverage under Obamacare, a fresh sign of the political problems the law’s rollout has created for congressional Democrats…
“The promise was made, and it should be kept,” Landrieu said in the Capitol Wednesday. “And it was our understanding when we voted for that bill that people when they have insurance could keep with what they had. So I’m going to be working on that fix.”…
Landrieu said that her bill would “grandfather” in soon-to-be-cancelled plans, even if insurance holders could find better policies through the exchanges.
Asked if she believed Obama wasn’t forthright with the public about the law, Landrieu said: “I didn’t think it was intentional” and said that the country would be “better off” if Republicans had tried to improve the law rather than repeal it repeatedly.
That boldfaced bit is the closest I’ve seen any Democrat come to recanting their vote. We’re not at that point yet but give it a few months, as the rate shock spreads and insurers start sweating over adverse selection problems driven by the website’s malfunction. Ironically, whether she knows it or not, Landrieu has in her own small way increased the odds that things will get worse for the law politically, not better: She was one of the 10 Senate Democrats who signed a letter to Sebelius last week calling on her to extend the enrollment period next year past March 31. Not only would that probably be illegal, the prospect of healthy young uninsured people being granted even more time to stay out of the risk pool is starting to give insurers the shakes. “If you can enroll at any point in the year, then you can just wait until you get sick,” noted one analyst. That’s right, and that’ll drive insurers’ costs up, which means either premiums will go up on everyone or HHS will need to bail the insurers out from the added cost. For all of Landrieu’s supposed pride in ObamaCare, she doesn’t seem to care much now about keeping the pieces in place that are needed to make this thing kinda sorta “work.”
And yet, in spite of it all:
Perceptions of ObamaCare are actually rosier now than they were this summer. The only explanation I have for that is that we’re in a partisan holding pattern while the first few months play out. Democrats are circling the wagons because they know Obama’s big “achievement” is wounded, but if the website isn’t fixed next month and the media coverage about rate shock turns even more sour, people will start to peel away next year. That’s Landrieu’s bet too, I assume, or else she wouldn’t have introduced her new bill, which is wildly off-message from this week’s rotating Democratic talking points of “it wasn’t a lie, it was a slight exaggeration,” “losing your plan will be good for you,” and “it’s the GOP’s fault.”
Speaking of which, via Newsbusters, here’s dopey Bill Maher stumbling onto the truth in arguing that Obama lied about keeping your plan because he knew O-Care wouldn’t have passed if he didn’t. To Maher, that’s a criticism of Republicans: If only they hadn’t opposed O, he wouldn’t have been forced to deceive people. Lord only knows how far he’s willing to extend that principle. Exit question via Ross Douthat: Why did Obama and his regulators at HHS make the rules disqualifying “grandfathered” plans even harsher than they had to be? I’ve been assuming it’s because they wanted to maximize the revenue from middle-class people being forced into more expensive “comprehensive” plans, but if O ever really did care about holding costs down, granting grandfather status to more plans that focus on catastrophic coverage would have done that better than the current scheme.
She’s a fraud.
She voted for Obamacare.
Gee In GUESSING as far as the Insurance companies whove already booted a host of people out of thier coverage...it may be a bit LATE to be looking at this sort of work around. ?
oh my
What kind of chumps does she take us for? Don’t answer.
She doesn't care one bit. It's all about keeping her stinking job.
Soon enough she’ll be an expert on the health care issues facing unemployed Americans.
Thats what happens when you sleep with the devil. The low-info insurers were promised all these rosy predictions of young, healthy enrolling. Wonder how their numbers are looking now?
It is all complete BS and crap. Liberals intend to completely destroy healthcare so they can rebuild it in their image.
Their goal is “single payer”. That is it. It is their Holy Grail. They are going to lie out of their teeth until it is too late for anyone or anything to stop them.
By then, the pieces of human refuse that are responsible for its destruction will have left office and absconded with their ill-gotten gains and private health care plans to safe locations, and the liberals of the day will blame it all on evil conservatives who hobbled the system by not allowing enough money to be poured into it.
That is, of course, when they aren’t extolling the virtues of socialized healthcare and telling us that 2+2=5 a la O’Brien in 1984.
It’s too late. I already lost the plan I had and liked on January 1, 2011. That plan did not cover the adult children of my co-workers. It had a lifetime liability cap, and it was directly connected to my FSA so that no deductibles ever came back to me. That was the plan I had. That was the plan I liked. That was the plan that ObamaCare outlawed.
She’ll hang on by the skin of Democrat election fraud.
Ol’ Mary is walking in to Obamamart and attempting to return a well-worn three year old Louisiana Purchase without a receipt and will feign shocked indigence when the clerk behind the counter gives her the stink eye.
“The promise was made, and it should be kept,” Landrieu said in the Capitol Wednesday. “And it was our understanding when we voted for that bill that people when they have insurance could keep with what they had. So I’m going to be working on that fix.”…
It’s always been my understanding that you should always read and understand what you are signing before putting your name to it. I wish she and the rest of the Rats that voted for this could be tried for TREASON over this debacle!
We have known that all along.
They’re still short the votes, which is the reason for the big amnesty push.
Unfortunately, some idiot RINOs are going along with it.
What an idiot? This buffoon doesn't realize that the Republicans are trying to do her, and the American people, a favor by attempting to repeal this horrible law....
That looks good to me.
Its my habit to look at that banner at least once a day...
Keep real HOPE alive!
Agree, in order to understand, you must first read!!!!
You betcha - the "Louisiana Purchase" ...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.