You said, “Those persons not needing naturalization are, apparently, already natural. They have been BORN automatically as citizens.”
It’s your use of the word “apparently” that should give us pause. That was accurate and honest language, and I respect and appreciate that very, very much. It’s an acknowledgement that what you’ve said is a logical inference not a clearly-stated legal fact.
It was “apparent” to us all that Obamacare was unconstitutional. The Obamacare ruling showed us that “apparently” isn’t good enough today. We need it written in stone, or these creepy critters will move the goalposts according to political expedience, like they did with Obamacare. And that is why I say we need to take the argument away from ourselves and put it to the courts. Like ALWAYS has to happen when there are legal arguments. Because how you and I infer things doesn’t matter one bit. How the courts have always inferred things before doesn’t matter one bit. Without a clear, unequivocal ruling there’s wiggle room for them to decide anything they want to decide. And that is what we need to protect ourselves from.
Does that make sense? Do you hear what I’m saying? I don’t know whose interpretation and inferences are right - meaning they match what the Founders meant at the time. But I do know that without a direct ruling SCOTUS becomes a bribe-able political weapon when somebody like Cruz threatens DC. We need to remove that weapon from Soros’ arsenal, before it is too late.
It makes sense that someone would want a clear ruling, but what I’m saying is that the courts have not been given that authority. It lies with congress according to the constitution to make all laws touching on naturalization.
I do not trust the black-robes.
I want elected officials doing this.