:: You are misrepresenting the court’s ruling in Minor. ::
To my reading, the courts decision in M v. H, supports an originalist understanding of the Constitution.
If, we come to an agreement that a 1783 understanding does not agree with a 2013 understanding of the plain language, then (i) let the court say so - which they did not in M v.H or (ii) let us force this change upon the people’s understanding and...simply...move on.
I live in the concept of today but ever learning from history. The people are vested in either preserving or re-defining history.
Bump!