To: Cletus.D.Yokel; wideawake; CodeToad
IIRC, CodeToad and Wideawake are the ones using ad hominem attacks against me. Please show me my error.
Actually, I (Cletus) have showed agreement with CT and WAwake’s arguments as to “modern” eligibility. There is no “proving me wrong” on this difference of opinon. Cruz is eligible (provided the SCOTUS does not remove him from office on eligibility impeachment)
You have as yet to answer, honestly, the posts by wideawake and codetoad at posts #95, #119, and #131. Instead, you bluster on about nothing important to this discussion instead of proving their contentions that you apparently have not read "Minor v. Happersett" since it does not support the conclusions you have arrived out concerning "Natural Born" citizens.
165 posted on
10/29/2013 1:10:34 PM PDT by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
To: SoConPubbie
It is not up to me to prove the accused negative.
When did you stop beating your wife?
172 posted on
10/29/2013 1:26:58 PM PDT by
Cletus.D.Yokel
(Catastrophic Anthropogenic Climate Alterations - The acronym explains the science.)
To: SoConPubbie
Thanks, and thanks for reading that case.
187 posted on
10/29/2013 2:00:03 PM PDT by
CodeToad
(Liberals are bloodsucking ticks. We need to light the matchstick to burn them off. -786 +969)
To: SoConPubbie
Oh...OK!
I have read M v. H. and find that it supports ny assertions regarding NBC. Thanks for playing!
[sarc] SoConPubbie, according to POST #165 no longer has a valid argument in this dicsussion. Thanks for participating and we have some nice parting gifts for you. [/sarc]
192 posted on
10/29/2013 2:06:20 PM PDT by
Cletus.D.Yokel
(Catastrophic Anthropogenic Climate Alterations - The acronym explains the science.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson