To: Joe 6-pack
No. The back of the head isn’t always execution style. There’s a front of a head and a back of a head in the same way there’s a front of a car and a back of a car.
My car getting hit in the back could mean the back fender instead of the back bumper. That’s still the back.
And if the dog is flanked by the two officers and it’s hit in the back of the head neither officer is in the line of fire.
77 posted on
10/25/2013 7:44:37 PM PDT by
xzins
( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
To: xzins
Where are you getting all this?
79 posted on
10/25/2013 7:47:23 PM PDT by
dragnet2
(Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
To: xzins
"And if the dog is flanked by the two officers and it’s hit in the back of the head neither officer is in the line of fire." And if the officers were on the dog's flanks, the dog wasn't really attacking either one of them, now was it?
80 posted on
10/25/2013 7:47:23 PM PDT by
Joe 6-pack
(Qui me amat, amat et canem meum.)
To: xzins
The back of the head isn’t always execution style. There’s a front of a head and a back of a head in the same way there’s a front of a car and a back of a car.
If the dog is shot in the back of the head, how is tarnation is it possible the dog was approaching the shooter as alleged?
82 posted on
10/25/2013 7:49:09 PM PDT by
dragnet2
(Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
To: xzins
You’re going to have better luck dancing on the head of a pin, than explaining how the dog was threatening the shooter when the dog was shot in the back of the head.
84 posted on
10/25/2013 7:51:10 PM PDT by
dragnet2
(Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson