These cops are going to run up on somebody one day that is not so understanding about killing their dog.
The cops are “justified” in making snap decisions like this in the “heat of the chase” and all......Where is the line ... when I see an unidentified person, on my property, with a gun in his hand, shooting my pet, my personal property?
How justified would I be if I made a snap decision and drew down and killed that person, as is my legal right to do?
Why would it be different if it was a low life scum bag with a criminal record or high on drugs that I killed protecting my property, than if it was a low life scum bag cop I killed protecting my property?