The cops are “justified” in making snap decisions like this in the “heat of the chase” and all......Where is the line ... when I see an unidentified person, on my property, with a gun in his hand, shooting my pet, my personal property?
How justified would I be if I made a snap decision and drew down and killed that person, as is my legal right to do?
Why would it be different if it was a low life scum bag with a criminal record or high on drugs that I killed protecting my property, than if it was a low life scum bag cop I killed protecting my property?
Some animals are more equal than others.