Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: chessplayer

If it doesn’t show on the screen, I’d say it doesn’t apply. Even more so if it’s just some boilerplate in a comment that isn’t even in the executing code.


3 posted on 10/24/2013 9:46:51 AM PDT by jiggyboy (Ten percent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: jiggyboy
Having been a coder for decades, I've see thousands of such messages. They generally point toward what other coders should find helpful in determining what to do as coding choices come up.

I would interpret this to mean that some lead coder is saying to those who may follow, "Don't bother going to any extra design or coding efforts to insure data privacy."

Perhaps as someone upthread said, "We don't need no steenking extra work to clutter up our lines of code!   Fast and loose, guys, fast and loose!"

HF

11 posted on 10/24/2013 11:18:45 AM PDT by holden (Alter or abolish it yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: jiggyboy
If it doesn’t show on the screen, I’d say it doesn’t apply. Even more so if it’s just some boilerplate in a comment that isn’t even in the executing code.

Who's to say, later, after the damage to privacy has occurred, and maybe a lawsuit is brought? It would be impossible to say what was on the screen and when. Besides, doesn't our government have sovereign immunity to just say FY?

33 posted on 10/25/2013 2:06:54 PM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson