Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

"His answers were also short when he was asked about the progress of the diesel-powered Cessna TurboSkylane JT-A following the test article's off-airport landing earlier this year. Asked specifically about the Skycatcher, Ernest responded "There's no future for the Skycatcher." When asked if the company was ending production of the LSA, Ernest answered by repeating: "There's no future." Ernest told reporters that Cessna's TurboSkylane JT-A program was supported by the company. He declined to directly address the mishap and when asked if that meant the aircraft hasn't flown since the incident, Ernest said, "I just answered the question." So, AVweb asked for more details in a podcast interview with Jodi Noah, vice president of piston arircraft for the company.

Regarding the diesel TurboSkylane, Noah said the company was continuing with the program, but offered few more details other than that the project had Cessna's support. Asked specifically about the SkyCatcher, Noah said the company had sold about 20 of the aircraft and has an inventory of more that are available for sale. Ernest's comments after his presentation categorized the SkyCatcher program simply. "That program didn't have a business model that worked," he said. Business models that appear to be working for Cessna include those for the company's line of business jets. Still in development, the Cessna Latitude is on track for first flight early next year. The new Citation X could be certified as early as March of 2014, boasting a top speed of .935 Mach and regaining the title of fastest production business jet. And regarding the recently announced Scorpion Jet tandem seat military offering, Ernest said it will fly this year, "sooner to this date than the end of the year."

1 posted on 10/22/2013 4:26:49 PM PDT by taildragger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: taildragger

Rules.


2 posted on 10/22/2013 4:28:42 PM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: taildragger
FWIW...

The SkyCatcher was made in China, and it's O-200 engine parent company was also bought by the Chinese. Both did not sit well with Gen-Av types...

3 posted on 10/22/2013 4:28:48 PM PDT by taildragger (The E-GOP won't know what hit them, The Party of Reagan is almost here, hang tight folks....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 04-Bravo; 1FASTGLOCK45; 1stFreedom; 2ndDivisionVet; 2sheds; 60Gunner; 6AL-4V; A.A. Cunningham; ...
Aviation and Aerospace ping

Click here to view: Highlights in the History of Aviation and Aerospace - The Past, The Present, and The Future

Please ping me to aviation and aerospace articles. Thank you.

If you want added to or removed from this ping list, please contact EveningStar or Paleo Conservative.

13 posted on 10/22/2013 4:50:35 PM PDT by EveningStar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: taildragger

” “That program didn’t have a business model that worked,” he said.”

No kidding! An “inexpensive” airplane became $150,000. I can buy all kinds of good airplanes with better characteristics for less money.

The idea was capitalize on the “Light Sport Aircraft” (LSA) market. That market wanted airplanes in the $25,000 to $65,000 price range at most.

An LSA is an airplane that weights no more than about half of what other airplanes weight, have weaker engines, and only require a Sport class license that allows a pilot to fly at his local airport during the daytime and only require about half the regular pilot training and use a driver’s license as the medical certificate instead of an FAA Medical Examiner performing a flight physical.

It was really about medically unqualified pilots, and people desiring to be pilots but medically unfit, that just wanted to get into the air. Some say it was about reducing costs for people only wanting to fly some. For some people that was true. The airplane market really does want to cut costs, but some used the opportunity to try to cheat the system.


14 posted on 10/22/2013 4:50:49 PM PDT by CodeToad (Liberals are bloodsucking ticks. We need to light the matchstick to burn them off. -786 +969)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: taildragger

Comes across as a bit of a jerk. Needs a Exec. VP with PR skills to hit the road and he needs to stay at his desk and have someone screen his calls. My sympathy to his direct reports.


30 posted on 10/22/2013 6:03:38 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: taildragger

“Ernest’s comments after his presentation categorized the SkyCatcher program simply. “That program didn’t have a business model that worked,” “

The original pan was to offer a GA LSA aircraft to the general public, as the new “150”, for less than $70K.

The mere fact that they had go to China, and still couldn’t keep the price under $125K says a lot about the current state of manufacturing in America.

All of those delays cost Cessna the market, as other LSA’s like the Slovenian-built Pipistrel Virus took away the market.


31 posted on 10/22/2013 6:23:37 PM PDT by tcrlaf (Well, it is what the Sheeple voted for....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: taildragger

GA has become a wealthy man’s game.

Gone are the days when the average person is involved.

We’ve come a long way America...The wrong way.


38 posted on 10/22/2013 7:22:06 PM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: taildragger

No market for a $130,000 2 seater that cruises at about 100 knots and can’t fly at night or IFR? Who could’ve ever guessed? /sarc

There could be a huge market for a new affordable GA airplane in the US, especially with the TSA. But Cirrus wanted to target the rich guys who used to buy Bos and Mooneys, and Cessna wanted to sell an LSA at a price that 95% of potential customers could never afford. And there’s still no one making an airplane that most of the market can afford.


40 posted on 10/22/2013 10:26:06 PM PDT by Turbopilot (iumop ap!sdn w,I 'aw dlaH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson