Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sir Napsalot
Obama: .... a civilian (cough)national security(cough) force just as well powerful, just as strong and just as well funded / equipped as the military

the end.

“We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we’ve set. We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.” Barack Hussein Obama, 7/2/2008
They don’t call it a Civil Defense force, that would imply we need (or perhaps that we deserve) defense. The official name is National Civilian Community Corps.

I think of it as the NATCCC, or simply the NATCs...

39 posted on 10/22/2013 7:11:52 AM PDT by null and void (I'm betting on an Obama Trifecta: A Nobel Peace Prize, an Impeachment, AND a War Crimes Trial...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: null and void
"...They don’t call it a Civil Defense force, that would imply we need (or perhaps that we deserve) defense. The official name is National Civilian Community Corps..."
52 posted on 10/22/2013 7:41:44 AM PDT by 444Flyer (How long O LORD?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

To: null and void
fyi - (in case you haven't seen it) related to we were discussing (weaken our military).

No training in 6 months, Army chief: Just 2 brigades combat-ready

97 posted on 10/23/2013 5:08:57 AM PDT by Sir Napsalot (Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson