Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Would Democrats Embrace a JFK Today?
Townhall.com ^ | October 20, 2013 | Jeff Jacoby

Posted on 10/21/2013 4:50:15 AM PDT by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

1 posted on 10/21/2013 4:50:15 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Nah. Too far right.

Even the Republicans would blame him on the TEA Party.

2 posted on 10/21/2013 4:52:17 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

He wouldn’t even have been elected Senator in Taxachussetts...


3 posted on 10/21/2013 4:53:37 AM PDT by Hotlanta Mike ("Governing a great nation is like cooking a small fish - too much handling will spoil it." Lao Tzu)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Yep


4 posted on 10/21/2013 4:54:49 AM PDT by Incorrigible (If I lead, follow me; If I pause, push me; If I retreat, kill me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

He also fought the Federal Reserve. Which is why he’s dead.


5 posted on 10/21/2013 4:56:15 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (Obama's favorite game is Pin the Fail on the Honkey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

There isn’t one America loving, constitution respecting democrat today. Not one. That’s all I know. This article serves no relevance except to rub salt in the wound of any liberty and freedom loving American.


6 posted on 10/21/2013 4:56:56 AM PDT by albie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I just wish this country would stop worshipping him as some sort of demi-god. He’s benn dead 50 years - do we still need to see him on the cover of all the magazines?


7 posted on 10/21/2013 4:56:58 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (21st century. I'm not a fan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

It’s ironic that the modern Democrat Party fully embraces the myth of a liberal JFK yet completely ignores his successor,LBJ, who was a COMPLETE lefty and whose policies are responsible for many of today’s government problems .


8 posted on 10/21/2013 4:57:21 AM PDT by Le Chien Rouge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hotlanta Mike

It has been fifty YEARS, people. Children have been born, grown, up, married, produced children of their own, and those children have produced another generation in that span of time.

Teddy pretty much single-handedly subverted whatever memory there was of JFK, and the assassination of Robert pretty much sealed the record of whatever real accomplishments the original JFK may have produced. Much of JFK’s rhetoric is also similarly deleted or de-emphasized.


9 posted on 10/21/2013 4:59:27 AM PDT by alloysteel (Men may not always be capable of evil, but they are always capable of incompetence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Sorenson gave Kennedy the expression, “A rising tide lifts all boats” in a speech, something he had seen in some New England newsletter, and Kennedy was on it like a duck on a junebug.
I suspect that he would be appalled by the Browns, Obamas, Clintons and Bidens. And the Sharptons, Jackson-Lees, McKinneys, et al? All the free-spending, whining grievance-mongers?
Fuggedaboutit.


10 posted on 10/21/2013 5:01:56 AM PDT by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: All armed conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hotlanta Mike

Senator in Taxachussetts? Based on the article, the GOPe would call JFK a “Tea Party” wacko bird and do everything possible to marginalize him if they couldn’t beat him, a la Senator Ted Cruz.


11 posted on 10/21/2013 5:04:15 AM PDT by CitizenUSA (Conservatives are not anarchists!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CitizenUSA

Senator in Taxachussetts? Based on the article, the GOPe would call JFK a “Tea Party” wacko bird and do everything possible to marginalize him if they couldn’t beat him, a la Senator Ted Cruz.


That was my point. The democratic party today is a step away from communism.


12 posted on 10/21/2013 5:10:44 AM PDT by Hotlanta Mike ("Governing a great nation is like cooking a small fish - too much handling will spoil it." Lao Tzu)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Yes they would embrace him because his policies would have “evolved” over time and he would not be saying the same things as he did as President. Let’s keep in mind that Senator Ted Kennedy was a strong pro lifer in the early 70’s.


13 posted on 10/21/2013 5:12:07 AM PDT by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Didn’t we see this same article, or similar, during the Clinton presidency?


14 posted on 10/21/2013 5:12:08 AM PDT by billhilly (Has Pelosi read it yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe
Yup. The words of his inaugural address would elicit gasps of disbelief, and opprobrium today. A very different world indeed:

"The world is very different now. For man holds in his mortal hands the power to abolish all forms of human poverty and all forms of human life. And yet the same revolutionary beliefs for which our forebears fought are still at issue around the globe—the belief that the rights of man come not from the generosity of the state, but from the hand of God."
15 posted on 10/21/2013 5:16:05 AM PDT by PowderMonkey (WILL WORK FOR AMMO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

JFK’s policies were too conservative for today’s GOPe.

JFK was only leftist on unions and government unions. On economics and defense, he was conservative.


16 posted on 10/21/2013 5:19:09 AM PDT by magellan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Most here will say ‘no’ because JFK was so much to the right of the current ‘Rat party. I'm going to say ‘yes’ because power is all they're after and as long as he calls himself a ‘Democrat’ and can win election they're going to support him. Everything else is malleable. “We've always been at war with ... who was it, now?”
17 posted on 10/21/2013 5:20:07 AM PDT by Paine in the Neck (Is John's moustache long enough YET?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

They’d embrace a JFK just as much as a Zell Miller.


18 posted on 10/21/2013 5:21:25 AM PDT by C210N (When people fear government there is tyranny; when government fears people there is liberty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

One other tidbit of information on JFK to drive the left nuts, he was an NRA lifetime member....


19 posted on 10/21/2013 5:21:27 AM PDT by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

A Democrat? He couldn’t even be an Establishment Republican.


20 posted on 10/21/2013 5:24:23 AM PDT by hometoroost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson