Replies

Yeah, I caught that. Her words need to be evaluated as a message from the Almighty - not in the context of "her beliefs". In that regard, it deserves serious consideration. Our founders, like ourselves, were not infallible people. An important point she made was that you can't serve two masters (government vs. God) and certainly we are not "one nation under God" - probably never were if you think about it. Perhaps we should be more careful about that which we proclaim to be?

Just sayin'...

I'm not saying this woman is crazy, but even a crazy person is right sometimes and in some of the things they might say. If the gist of her message was...:

“The greatest deception here is this is not one nation under God... You cannot serve two masters. You cannot serve two masters. Praise be to God, the Lord Jesus Christ. Praise forever.”

...then I'm right there with her. All the strange Freemason conspiracy stuff-- only God knows where that came from.

Yeah, I caught that. Her words need to be evaluated as a message from the Almighty - not in the context of "her beliefs". In that regard, it deserves serious consideration. Our founders, like ourselves, were not infallible people. An important point she made was that you can't serve two masters (government vs. God) and certainly we are not "one nation under God" - probably never were if you think about it. Perhaps we should be more careful about that which we proclaim to be? Just sayin'...

One might be prone to consider what she said in the context of what happened at the Democrat convention in 2012. Recall they denied God three times. Many compared that moment to Peter denying Christ.

I submitted then and again now...it was more a Joshua 24 moment. In fact as I watched that scene unfold live the very words that came to mind at the time were..."as for me and my house, we will serve the Lord."