[boomstick]

One more question — why in the world would you want Sarvis to stop talking about ‘marriage equality’, race, and drug legalization? For the love of God, the more he talks about that stuff the more likely he’ll pull from Fast Terry’s soft support.

[CatherineofAragon]

"One more question — why in the world would you want Sarvis to stop talking about ‘marriage equality’, race, and drug legalization? For the love of God, the more he talks about that stuff the more likely he’ll pull from Fast Terry’s soft support."

You would think, but do a search of "Robert Sarvis splitting votes" and you'll see a consensus that Cuccinelli is the one suffering from Sarvis' candidacy. The most optimistic article I found (for Ken) estimated that Sarvis is siphoning off 7% of votes from Cuccinelli compared to 4% for McAuliffe.