Posted on 10/14/2013 5:31:00 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
So then what is your problem with Limbaugh & Levin?
Besides, Hannity is still conservative. Just because he has a liberal for a guest does not make him the friggin problem.
Let’s not forget how much airtime Rush gave Rubio as well...
Newbie...haha...oooooh, you checked my previous posts. How 1337 you is. I've been around this site a loong time, long enough to remember when thirty freepers were always fixing some n00b leaving italic's open in threads (which ultimately lead to a thread of of 30 fixes and four comments). Just because you can't see through those guys doesn't make it my problem.
Bull. I have problems with Hannity, but not for supporting the GOP-E, and as far as Rush goes. You should begin to pound sand because you are way off base on him.
You obviously do Not listen to him enough or you would not accuse him of such.
Even Jim supported Romney eventually, but not until Newt fell out and only to get rid of Obama.
So will you now attack Jim also?
Seems to me like it’s time for lawsuits.
Problem with conservative third parties is they are too many saying basically the same thing. The Ohio law may have an unintended good consequence. If forces the conservatives to pool their efforts into one united front. Short term law is bad, but in long run it may have a good effect. Of course the two parties may change the requirement from 3 percent to 12 percent/sarc.
Easy to say you remember events that others have talked about or are easy to look up.
I can say so with proof.
You claim it with no proof.
You are a troll.
There was a freeper back in 2000 who said it best; Hannity is the “aw shucks” big goofball that attracts the soccer mom’s to conservatism. So hearing that mindless twit spout off now when he had ample opportunities before makes me SICK of HIM! He’s opportunistic plain and simple.
Hannity babbled on for years after 9/11 about Islam being “a religion of peace”.
He is an idiot of the highest order, and (contrary to any delusions you might harbor) major league idiots are a huge part of the problem. Even well intentioned ones.
There are other issues on which Hannity has not always been up to snuff, but the nature of islam is critical and too few were willing to explain what was coming at the critical point. Some through collusion. Some through cowardice. Some through idiocy. Hannity is the latter regardless of his sheepskins.
If you want to defend him, then that requires either asserting that Islam either actually is a religion of peace or that it doesn’t matter if you pretend that it is.
Spike.
Whatever, classygreeneyedblond..
And then took him to the woodshed for backing away from what hye told Rush he would do.
Listen to everything, not just what you want to hear.
So did Jim call for him to run before we learned the truth. So is Jim a liberal and a problem because he too was fooled.
It won't be long until you're where I am: Hang 'em all hang 'em high. They're ALL crooks. D's, R's, doesn't matter to me.
Watch what you accuse those you do not know of being!
The sky will fall on you.
I PROMISE!
“How is this legal? I know you can do this kind of crap in the EUSSR, but in America? Banning opposition parties?”
The gop/’rat uniparty has been doing it for years. It’s something they’re in complete agreement about: denying ballot access to any uppity newcomers.
Attacking Like Levin, Limbaugh is not my idea of attacking the left.
So is this where we have gotten to on FR. Newbies claiming they know so much about those who fought the good fight that they now become the enemy here and no one stands up for them?
We have all had our share of complaints about those who do talk radio, but it is not as easy to get people informed about the truth as many newbies may think.
It seems like it has become too easy for newbies to post attacks on conservatives with no one defending them,.
Has FR has been brought down so low that we are now eating even those who are still fighting the good fight?
I’ll admit, I get pi$$ed off when Libertarian candidates cost us in races, like the governorship in Virginia, where you have a Republican candidate who is pretty solid and even has the endorsement of Libertarian kingmaker, Ron Paul for crying out loud.
That being said, I would never support banning third parties from running, on principle alone.
Banning third parties is one step away from banning second parties.
OV: There are way too many of them on FR. They think they can water down our conversation. Little do they understand is that trolls only reinforces our beliefs because they sound so absurd. We’ve got your back.
True
Nobody is ever conservative enough for Conservatives.
The left will support their candidate no matter what and they keep moving the bar further and further left.
Meanwhile Conservatives are saying Palin isn’t conservative enough.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.