Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Food stamp shopping spree, who pays? (WalMart Looting Story Update)
KSLA-TV12 ^ | October 14, 2013 | Fred Childers

Posted on 10/14/2013 4:04:56 PM PDT by abb

SHREVEPORT, LA (KSLA) -

KSLA News 12 obtained video of overflowing shopping carts, excited shoppers, and empty shelves throughout Walmart in Springhill, Louisiana. The frenzy was reportedly created this weekend by a food stamp glitch in the system. That glitch allowed EBT card users to seemingly shop without a limit. But there was a limit the whole time.

According to the state, the retailer is on the hook for the overages.

The Department of Children and Family Services oversees those benefits, called SNAP, or Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.

DCFS tells KSLA News 12 that no EBT card is ever limitless, and that when these outages happen, the retailer has a responsibility to implement emergency procedures. Those procedures include placing a phone call and verbally approving a spending limit for the customer. Trey Williams with DCFS says some retailers chose not to do that.

"These businesses are only reimbursed for the benefits on the card, and they are completely responsible. So if someone had 50 dollars on their card, and they spent 100, the retailer, in this case Walmart, would be on the hook for the other fifty.

So, isn't this fraud? The state has a way of tracking welfare fraud with GPS based software. DCFS knows who purchased what, and how much was spent. That information is available to be passed on to law enforcement, should it be requested. The information is there, the question is now, what will they do with it?


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: foodstamps; looting; walmart
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-117 next last
To: Democrat_media

Before we slam the EBT cardholders for stealing while the system snafued, we better go after the real crooks who did the same thing. Wall Street Bankers.
When the gov forced bankers to do subprime mortgages Pres Clinton offer to mitigate the risks by having these loans bundled and Freddie Mac/Fannie Mae buy them within six months of underwriting.
Bankers discovered Freddie Mac/Fannie Mae did not review the info on the applications when they purchased them. Bankers flooded this loophole in the federal system and immediately instructed their mortgage agents to encourage liar loans. Income, bank account funds and credit scores were made up so applicants can buy homes they normally cannot afford. The banks earn more fees and points if the loan amounts were larger. Banks could have done the moral thing and stick to their common commercial practice they use to protect themselves, but felt they did not need to do that if the gov (taxpayers) were on the hook, thus the bankers choose to go full steam ahead into the regulatory gap with liar loans.
The rest is history on Sept 2008. Any bankers go to jail??!!! If the poor figure the Harvard and Yale grads CEO do not have to be honest when the gov screws up, why should they?


41 posted on 10/14/2013 4:35:04 PM PDT by Fee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

So I can go down to the local Wallyworld, walk out with a $1K 60” big screen, and no one will care?


42 posted on 10/14/2013 4:35:44 PM PDT by abb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: abb; All

Don't forget that the EBT system is -- in itself -- one GIGANTIC MONTHLY shopping spree paid for by taxpayers...

And some of these EBTholders are already stealing from the taxpayers...so they were just upping their "hold-up" take on this Sat night outing...

43 posted on 10/14/2013 4:35:49 PM PDT by Colofornian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fee

Thread hijack in progress...


44 posted on 10/14/2013 4:36:27 PM PDT by abb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

I hate that attitude. I had my own business for a few years, and shoplifters were treated to all manner of unpleasantness. Then I worked for a national chain in the same line of goods and a guy ran out the door with a bunch of stuff, I went after him with a crowbar. About three blocks from the store I looked back and the manager and assistant were running after me... I figured they were reinforcements but no, they grabbed me before I caught the guy.


45 posted on 10/14/2013 4:36:36 PM PDT by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: abb

EBT benefits are reloaded monthly. People may end up with a negative balance on their cards. It’s possible that some people’s next month’s benefits will go to pay off the negative balance on their card. Or not.


46 posted on 10/14/2013 4:38:59 PM PDT by DadofMany1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigbob
...let the shelves be cleared as quickly as possible, then lock the doors, leaving the lights on so anyone can see there’s nothing left inside. At least that might minimize the damage of vandalism and fire.

Either that, or start shooting the looters and leave the lights on, so other urban-savages could see all the dead-bodies and move along.

47 posted on 10/14/2013 4:40:17 PM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER (The "government" is nothing but a RAT jobs program)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: abb
gibmedat yo !
48 posted on 10/14/2013 4:41:33 PM PDT by tomkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

The detention allowed by law is something like 30 minutes. Many places in high crime areas it takes like an hour plus for the cops to show up unless there’s active gunfire.

Unable to detain them, risk of a lawsuit for ‘false imprisonment, stores just let them go. Most will try to get these ‘customers’ to sign “I will not return” agreements they can use against them in the future.

Or they just let the merchandise walk.

Some (where my sister works) will come back with no receipt and demand CASH for the stolen merchandise (store refund).

No end to the brazenness.

People who get everything for nothing have zero respect for the system and resent the people giving to them. It’s human nature. We’re feeding the dysfunction.


49 posted on 10/14/2013 4:42:39 PM PDT by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Black Agnes

Maybe they will release that data. I would bet it is not a small amount.


50 posted on 10/14/2013 4:43:02 PM PDT by LibLieSlayer (FROM MY COLD, DEAD HANDS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: abb
"So, isn't this fraud? The state has a way of tracking welfare fraud with GPS based software. DCFS knows who purchased what, and how much was spent. That information is available to be passed on to law enforcement, should it be requested. The information is there, the question is now, what will they do with it?"

You don't understand. These are 0bama voters. They will be protected.

51 posted on 10/14/2013 4:43:53 PM PDT by YHAOS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HChampagne

I agree the amount should be their food stamps should be be garnished to pay off this debt. If there is a nationwide boycott to protest prosecuting theft Walmart is going to lose just as much if not more in the way of reputation and honest customers. Where else are these parasites going to go anyway ?


52 posted on 10/14/2013 4:45:45 PM PDT by erlayman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Tijeras_Slim

My sister told me about 1 guy they did prosecute after he stole nearly $100,000 worth of goods over a period of time. He counter-sued Walmart for tempting him.

Walmart won after spending better than a half million dollars but their insurer made Walmart utilize greater security on a whole bunch of different products.


53 posted on 10/14/2013 4:45:48 PM PDT by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: ridesthemiles
The GLITCH was in the food stamp program. Why would the retailers be responsible.???

Because it was the retailer who made the decision to accept the cards knowing the balance could not be verified. They could have simply suspended acceptance of the cards until the problem was resolved. Walmart was trying to do the right thing for their customers, many of whom use the EBT card. The thing they didn't count on was social media. Within minutes of the decision the store was overrun by friends and relatives of those already in line.
54 posted on 10/14/2013 4:45:58 PM PDT by slumber1 (My real name is Rusty Shackleford)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: slumber1
Within minutes of the decision the store was overrun by friends and relatives of those already in line.

The proper term is "looting."

55 posted on 10/14/2013 4:47:25 PM PDT by abb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: abb

A post earlier said that without EBT cards, there wouldn’t be so many WalMarts. If that’s true, then WalMart will have to just swallow the loss and move on. If it’s not quite true, then in absorbing the loss, WalMart could just decide that it will no longer accept the EBT cards.


56 posted on 10/14/2013 4:47:53 PM PDT by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Colofornian

SNAP should not be good for anything much more than beans, rice, and a bit of cooking oil. Want meat? Get a job.


57 posted on 10/14/2013 4:48:46 PM PDT by wrencher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: ridesthemiles

That’s actually a good idea. Make people swipe the card before starting so they can stop when the reach the end.


58 posted on 10/14/2013 4:49:44 PM PDT by Excellence (All your database are belong to us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Fee
somebody posted the same rant at the dump on a similar thread... just saying
59 posted on 10/14/2013 4:50:34 PM PDT by Chode (Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -vvv- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: abb

They vote.

Some twice.

Did you vote?


60 posted on 10/14/2013 4:53:41 PM PDT by hadaclueonce (dont worry about Mexico, put the fence around kalifornia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-117 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson