color of law
Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both;
I know, by this statute, that I have the right to be protected from drunk drivers.
Did this cop enhance those rights? Probably not.
Does the judicial system?
Not for the money I pay them in taxes.
I don’t drive in my town on Friday nights. Too many drunk drivers.
They own the road.
There’s no regard for this law as it pertains to me and my family and our safety.
There are more deaths in my state on the roads every year than 1000 times as were killed in any shooting massacre in the past two years. But people accept that as normal.
Some cops get sick of the death, I imagine.
Is that a yes or a no?
Ma’am you don’t have the “right” for police to do SQUAT for you... USSC says so.
Anyhow you have a severe self-vengeance problem. Does it really eat you that the bible says beloved, do not take your own vengeance, but make room for the wrath [of God]? Apparently it does because you are bucking it with all your strength. Can’t even wait for a judge or jury to sit and pick through the accusations.
>> I know, by this statute, that I have the right to be protected from drunk drivers.
Actually, you don’t have the right to be protected from drunk drivers — basically, drunk drivers don’t have the right to drive.