Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: stanne

>> I know, by this statute, that I have the right to be protected from drunk drivers.

Actually, you don’t have the right to be protected from drunk drivers — basically, drunk drivers don’t have the right to drive.


117 posted on 10/11/2013 11:03:59 PM PDT by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]


To: Gene Eric

stanne is screaming, in fact, for a state to be a nanny. It can NOT be a nanny... it lacks the resources to do nannydom right. But mere boring, and at least attemptedly impartial, administration of investigations, trials, and punishments upon due conviction... why there’s no satisfaction in that! Not for those who want states to be nannies!


119 posted on 10/11/2013 11:11:39 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (The Lion of Judah will roar again if you give him a big hug and a cheer and mean it. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]

To: Gene Eric

Wrong. I have the right on legal roads to expect the police to protect me from drunk drivers that’s what this is all about

Same as she has the right to be protected from them

Btw she was prepared to do a whole lot more damage to seine else than he did to her. Of course he didnt have the right


127 posted on 10/12/2013 1:49:43 AM PDT by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson