Skip to comments.
Radical climate change just around the corner: study
AFP News ^
| October 9, 2013
Posted on 10/09/2013 3:04:48 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-67 next last
To: Oldeconomybuyer
41
posted on
10/09/2013 3:57:20 PM PDT
by
beethovenfan
(If Islam is the solution, the "problem" must be freedom.)
To: Ouderkirk
42
posted on
10/09/2013 4:04:12 PM PDT
by
Para-Ord.45
( Americans, happy in tutelage by the reflection that they have chosen their own dictators.)
To: NewHampshireDuo
It's not in the original story.
And no, it's not a she.
Don't people check stuff out before commenting?
43
posted on
10/09/2013 4:06:28 PM PDT
by
x
To: Ouderkirk
Even after all of that... it’s still just a model, and a new model at that. The ultimate test of any model is to see how well its predictions match the real world, but this one has no track record to check yet.
To: JPG
This one's even more appropriate:
To: Dallas59
Where did this happen? Sign her up for the NFL!
46
posted on
10/09/2013 4:34:57 PM PDT
by
Pining_4_TX
(All those who were appointed to eternal life believed. Acts 13:48)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
There are some who will believe this scare attempt. And most who will see it for what it is.
47
posted on
10/09/2013 5:09:20 PM PDT
by
lurk
To: gundog
if Camilo Mora-Wanker married Anthony Weiner, she’d be... oh never mind!
48
posted on
10/09/2013 5:17:00 PM PDT
by
Flick Lives
(The U.S. is dead to me.)
To: Hillary'sMoralVoid
In 1963 Edward Lorenz wrote “Deterministic Nonperiodic Flow” which showed a proof that future weather can not be predicted in a non-trivial way. The Navier Stokes equations are non-linear, chaotic, and show sensitive dependence on initial conditions. That means that no finite set of past states can ever be sufficient to predict non-trivial future states.
To the extent that people predict the future to justify their global warming assertions, to that extent it is a hoax.
49
posted on
10/09/2013 5:18:11 PM PDT
by
donmeaker
(The lessons of Weimar are soon to be relearned.)
To: Dallas59
Michelle’s lost quite a bit of weight since her wedding reception...
50
posted on
10/09/2013 5:22:32 PM PDT
by
COBOL2Java
(I'm a Christian, pro-life, pro-gun, Reaganite. The GOP hates me. Why should I vote for them?)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
They don't even need computer models to do this. They just sit around in seminars ăying, "What if...," and then pick the best sounding one to publish.
51
posted on
10/09/2013 6:16:09 PM PDT
by
arthurus
(Read Hazlitt's Economics In One Lesson ONLINEhttp://steshaw.org/economics-in-one-lesson/)
To: GOPJ
I would rather live through a zombie apocalypse... at least I could shoot the zombies!
52
posted on
10/09/2013 6:26:55 PM PDT
by
LibLieSlayer
(FROM MY COLD, DEAD HANDS!)
To: LibLieSlayer
53
posted on
10/09/2013 6:32:04 PM PDT
by
JediJones
(The #1 Must-see Filibuster of the Year: TEXAS TED AND THE CONSERVATIVE CRUZ-ADE)
To: JediJones
54
posted on
10/09/2013 6:32:47 PM PDT
by
LibLieSlayer
(FROM MY COLD, DEAD HANDS!)
To: Flycatcher; Hillary'sMoralVoid
Neither IVW, nor IAC concern me as much as what we are experiencing in the Northern United States, an effect known as PSAD (post Solstice Accelerated Darkening -- although this is controversial, some believe it to be
pre Solstice Accelerated Darkening... scientific nit-picking ... whatever.)
This horrible effect becomes even more pronounced as one approaches the North Pole. There is speculation in some quarters that parts of the planet above the arctic circle may have a day with no light at all.
But perhaps even more concerning is that this phenomenon is clearly aggravated by predictable human activity. Best evidence now says that we will lose an entire hour of daylight at exactly 2:00 AM on November 3rd.
We're gassing up the chainsaws, stocking propane, depleted uranium ammo and freeze-dried apricots.
Just in case...
55
posted on
10/09/2013 6:34:35 PM PDT
by
FredZarguna
(With bell, book, and candle, please.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
56
posted on
10/09/2013 6:38:47 PM PDT
by
Straight Vermonter
(Posting from deep behind the Maple Curtain)
To: x
There's a famous public bathroom in downtown London where Camilo parked her bowels.
I think you'll find the commentary is less concerned with whether there should be gender confusion over the name "Camilo," and the clearly eponymous "Wanker."
57
posted on
10/09/2013 6:41:13 PM PDT
by
FredZarguna
(With bell, book, and candle, please.)
To: JediJones
58
posted on
10/09/2013 7:24:30 PM PDT
by
GOPJ
(Brieitbart sent me... Freeper newfreep)
To: FredZarguna
You may yet save us all, sir.
Keep up the good work!
59
posted on
10/09/2013 7:41:23 PM PDT
by
Flycatcher
(God speaks to us, through the supernal lightness of birds, in a special type of poetry.)
To: FredZarguna
Can’t say much about science, but something comes to me as common sense. How is it that our planet could grow warmer when it’s heated by a star? What happens to stars? Do they not grow dimmer with time? No doubt in my mind that the planet will die when the sun stops warming it. We are going to freeze to death!
60
posted on
10/09/2013 9:13:13 PM PDT
by
WVNan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-67 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson